It's always a tricky question to answer when someone outside the Industry (or even some inside) asks you what happens to horses after they are finished racing. I tend to mumble something about some being used for riding hacks and then my voice trails away as the alternative fate becomes apparent to the person asking the question. Unfortunately the accurate answer is that the majority are euthanased and sold for pet food, as there is just not enough feed or healthy paddocks to house these animals. This has been illustrated more than once when some horse lover with the best intentions ends up with paddocks full of starving ex-racehorses. However an e-mail that came my way this week has indicated that there may be an alternative for at least some of our retired stock. It came from a young lady named Karen who has taken it upon herself to break to saddle and rehouse standardbreds so that they can compete in events including, apparently, A & P Shows. She assures me that the breed is becoming more and more popular among horse riders as they are ideal for trekking and general riding. Karen gave up her job 9 years ago to concentrate on this task, and this, combined with milking cows keeps her very busy. She has access to a dentist, farrier and chiropractor, so it is obvious that these horses are well treated and will make ideal riding horses for almost any task. Karen maintains that she has a waiting list for horses at present, and being based in the Waikato area would love to hear from any trainer who has a horse that they feel would be suitable. She reckons she will take on just about anything...she obviously enjoys a challenge! So anyone out there who has a slow racehorse they are at a loss to know what to do with, give Karen a call on 07-8238281 or 027-2483021 and she will come and pick up in the local areas. If you want to know more about what she does go to www.freewebs.com/track2hacksrus This lady is very dedicated and deserves support.

Peter T Cook

Michael Stiassny

I don't profess to be much of a mathematician, and probably fortunately for the Country, I have not been involved in multi-million dollar businesses, but there are aspects of this One Racing proposal I really struggle with.

On the one hand, we have Racing Board Michael Stiassny claiming that unless the One Racing concept is introduced, the Industry is basically doomed. Then about a month later, he announces a sizeable increase in profit for the first six months of the season, despite the recession, apparently due to the actions of the new highly paid Chief Executive/Hatchet Man Andrew Brown. So maybe the guy is worth the money they are paying him, although it might be a touch early to judge just yet.

What I don't get is, if things are improving at such a rapid rate and the Country is coming out of recession, why on earth would we want to change anything...something about not fixing it if it ''ain't broke'' comes to mind.

Of course the cynical in me suspects that the reason that the guys who came up with the report (heavily Thoroughbred biased) have more knowledge of the workings of that Code than I do and consequently see One Racing as a way to sort out the problems of NZTR without causing a major upheaval in it's ranks. There are also substantial possible benefits for the Thoroughbred code should the proposed amalgamation take place, particularly in the realm of dates and the probable scrapping of the infamous Section 16.

Before I wrote this piece, I did take the time to wade through the waffle that fills up most of the Race Cafe to get a Thoroughbred slant on the matter, and without copying any of them here, there are some very illuminating, not to mention disturbing, opinions to be found in the New Zealand TB section.

Members might also pay to note that neither trainers, jockeys or owners are considered important enough to warrant a vote at the NZTR Executive table......might indicate where their priorities lie.

Peter T Cook

The year kicked off with a meeting of the Greater Canterbury Branch and, not surprisingly, there were a few issues that had cropped up over the busy holiday racing schedule. Addington CEO Shane Gloury was unable to make his regular appearance, however he did send along some matters of interest, including an outline of his review and plans for some restructuring of aspects of the Raceway business. These will be revealed in the near future. Funding was apparently available for addressing the issue of the problems being encountered with slippery concrete in the new stable block, and hopefully these would be rectified in the near future, along with issues surrounding the float car park on dual code race-nights. HRNZ sought an okay for Massey University students to carry out studies on the physical demands, diets and fitness levels of harness drivers, probably around the upcoming Manawatu meetings. The results of this study will be made available to the Assn. and I plan to publish them on this site. Could make interesting reading! The Waterlea track came under some scrutiny and the Branch intends to write to the Marlborough Club outlining various concerns and suggestions, including the installation of a passing lane. It is also understand that there may be long overdue work planned on the infamous last bend at the Kaikoura track. Bruce Hutton has volunteered to take over from Colin DeFillippi as the Branch representative on the local Licensing Committee. Thanks to Colin for his efforts in what can sometimes be a difficult task. Other matters discussed included the imminent introduction of a new Swedish helmet which was apparently lighter and more comfortable than many of the current models, a suggestion that partners badges be issued with licenses to enable wives etc. to avoid having to pay entry fees to Summer Races meetings (yes I know – what Summer), and another suggestion relevant to gear changes, proposing that, when a horse changes stables, the gear should revert to a ''clean sheet'' and it would be the responsibility of the new trainer to submit a new list. Once again there were issues reported surrounding Stipendiary decisions, the most disturbing being a driver charged with not keeping his horse up to the mobile despite having been hit in the face and blinded by a clod off the track at the wet day at Nelson. Once again, common sense takes a holiday! The other interesting discussion point concerned what happened to the Harness plus bonuses when horses are transferred to another race from one that doesn't get off the ground. Should they still be eligible for a bonus? So, in other words, the bonus should be attached to that horse over a meeting instead a specific race. If more than one horse was put in that situation, could the bonus be split? We will make further inquiries on this one and report back.

Peter T Cook

Welcome to 2010, hope you had an enjoyable time over what was, for many of our members, anything but a holiday break. While some might find it hard to remember what day of the week it is when such things don't matter much, some of our Industry leading lights have had trouble remembering what part of the Country they were in!

Anyway as things get back to normal, I thought we might revisit a topic that the Association is pursuing at present, that being the varying philosophies being pursued by our Stipendiary Stewards, popularly known as ''Consultation or Confrontation''.

Possibly by coincidence a newspaper article has come to light from the deep South, which is the ''hot-bed'' of the Stipendiary consultation attitude, extolling the virtues of a new policy being adopted by the local police force. This policy involves a big focus on reducing crime rather than just arresting criminals, and has seen a 17% drop in the crime rate in the area over a period of five months compared to the previous year.

Now, I know what you're thinking, it's a pretty long bow comparing front line policing to the duties of our Stipendiary, although on the odd occasion you might wonder! But the basic principles are the same. To quote a senior officer, ''It's not rocket science.....if we can prevent crime from taking place, it means fewer victims and less victimisation.''

Arguably there are not too many actual victims involved where harness racing is involved, but the game is rife with allegations, some of them well-founded, of victimisation. I'll let the reader decide whether that is good for the all-important ''public perception'' that HRNZ is always concerned about where our members are concerned.

Another officer is quoted in the article as saying that when he joined the police 36 years ago, the glory was in arresting criminals. ''Now the glory is in preventing the offences being committed.''

Perhaps our Stipes could see the merit in bringing some of their philosophies up to date also.

Peter T Cook

The entire first morning of the recent meeting was devoted to a robust question and answer session with Michael Stiassny, Chair of the NZ Racing Board, over the proposed ''One Industry'' report. It is important that all involved in harness racing read the questions asked of the Board by HRNZ(available on the HRNZ website) so that they understand that the Executive is acting responsibly.

You will probably be aware that worm drench Lovamisole will now be tested for, however the Association strongly opposed any retrospective testing of a product that was readily available and was not listed as a prohibited substance. Check with-holding times with your vet.

The Association voiced it's concern at the performance of some Clerks of the Course and Clubs are to be reminded of their obligation in this area. Enquiries are being made on how these officials gain accreditation and training in Australia.

The Racing Board advise that turnover is currently $3 million ahead of budget for the season to date, also that they are installing 20 new self-service betting machines while maintaining that 400 more are required. The updated returns of income to stakemoney is as follows: gallopers 83.32%, harness 98.62% and greyhounds 66.27%.

The Franklin Club are looking at purchasing land adjacent to their current property, the Rangiora Club are in arbitration over the purchase of their Raceway, and the Ascot Park redevelopment is progressing well.

We were advised that some gaming trusts have money available for any purpose other than stake-money.

The Association strongly expressed it's disgust at the charges laid against Philip Butcher on Show Day, and congratulations to greater Canterbury Branch Chair Anthony Butt who was apparently the only person who noticed that one of Bettor Strikes hopple shortner pins had come out just prior to the NZ Cup and advised the Starter. Great sportsmanship Ants.

On behalf of National Chairman John Lischner, other National Council members, all Committee member's, Seretaries and the undersigned, have a great Christmas and a healthy and prosperous New Year. It looks like being a challenging one for HRNZ!

Peter T Cook P.S Updates will be back in a couple of weeks time.

Southland National Council member Gordon Lee, who was campaigning a horse at Alexandra Park, was a guest at the Branch's December meeting. In line with the other Branches, there was strong support for Gordon's almost infamous campaign for what is commonly known as the Bulls Eye barrier draw system aka. Scratching Substitute System (described elsewhere on the site) It is obvious that there is growing support around the Country for this, and many Clubs are also indicating their interest. It is planned to put up a remit concerning this at the next Conference.

There was mixed news from Alexandra Park, a lack of available funds had seen the drivers room upgrade put on hold, however the new conditioner was now in use and was now travelling the same way as the horses on race night.

There was agreement with the Greater Canterbury Branch at the standard of some Clerks of the Course, although it was felt that action on this may result in having to employ two of these officials. There was also agreement concerning ideas on the Philip Butcher case, and criteria for the World Drivers Champs.

There was strong criticism of many points of the One Racing Report, suggesting that many of the figures quoted were in error.

Matters of concern were, whether the starter had the discretion to remove the 10 metre barrier, where horses could start when off a handicap, and disappointment at the fine imposed on the Australian trainer for his actions on the morning of Cup Day when administering 'Boost” This was done in front of the allocated guard and, if the substance had been administered by spoon instead of the syringe there would have been no Rule broken!

Other items discussed included the stand-down period following charges being laid, which was not supported, recent alterations on gear changes, which were welcomed, and clarification of the timing of Amateur races.

Peter T Cook

Clerk of the Course

It is with increasing concern that the Association is noting the quality and lack of ability of some Clerks of the Course to perform the duties that they are employed for.

There have been a number occasions recently where these officials have been noticeably inactive when urgent action is required, and while there may be mitigating circumstances that have meant that inaction was the best policy, that is not always the case. The first race at the recent Geraldine Trotting Clubs meeting at Orari is a perfect case in point.

Two drivers were tipped out at the start and one of the horses careered off after field, looped it, and carried on in front until after the event had finished. It was fairly obvious that the horse with a driver in front of the field was severely hampered and probably denied a win, but the most concerning aspect is what could have potentially happened if the driver-less horse had become tangled in it's gear or taken fright, and come down. In these days of Clubs being forced to spend large sums of money ensuring that there racecourses are safe, it seems a little incongruous that one of the major players in maintaining the safety of both drivers and the public, remained a spectator throughout the whole affair.

However, of even greater concern is that several good judges of horse-flesh were adamant that, even if the Clerk of the Course at Orari had been inclined to make an effort to catch the runaway horse, there is no way his portly mount would have been capable of such exertions!

The Association has approached HRNZ on this matter previously, only to be told that any training or qualification for the position of Clerk was not possible, however we have learnt that there is a form of accreditation procedure in Australia, details of which we are attempting to obtain.

While the Clerks employed by the major tracks such as Addington do a super job, there is no way that incompetent officials should be allowed to be simply a bystander when lives are at stake.

Peter T Cook

Mark McNamara

The last Committee meeting of the year saw new Canterbury race caller Mark McNamara come along as a guest. Mark, who is doing a superb job for racing in the Canterbury region, apparently enjoyed seeing how the Association worked and said afterwards that he was surprised at the range of topics that were discussed.

It was pleasing to hear that the matter of trainers being able to drive outside horses at trials (other than qualifiers) had been cleared up and this would now not be questioned by the Stipendiary. There was, however, further concern at the performance of some Clerks of the Course, following the potentially disastrous occurrence of the runaway horse in the first race at Orari the other day. There was evidence that the horse being employed for the job was well below the required fitness level. Another approach will be made to HRNZ on this issue.

There was also concern at the timing of Amateur Drivers events in the South where they where scheduled in between tote events, thereby interfering with track preparation and preliminary times. A response to complaints had been received from the Ashburton club suggesting that the cost of employing staff precluded these races being held after the last race, however the Committee felt that the Amateur Drivers Association should meet these costs.

John Lischner and the undersigned met with JCA Board member Peter Smith to discuss the form that the proposed educational DVD for drivers in the enquiry room would take, with Anthony Butt and Ken Barron (both fairly skilled at defending themselves in the room)being put forward as consultants.

Addington's Shane Gloury gave a review of Cup day activities and also advised that new mats would be installed in the boxes in the new stable block. He had also received a quote for engineers to install a lowering facility for the troublesome light towers at the Raceway. After many years of inaction on these shadow causing poles, it was pleasing to hear that some movement was at last imminent. Nigel McGrath, a recent harsh critic of the condition of the Addington track, praised the current surface, which has seen some sensational times registered in recent weeks, even in minor races.

Other matters discussed on the night included the Industry Task Force, the need for some mechanism to speed up the hearing of charges, and the current charges against Philip Butcher which were considered totally unnecessary.

Peter T Cook

Ever since I have been involved in the administration of Harness Racing (quite a bit longer than I would care to dwell on), it has been an accepted part of the Industry's tapestry that those involved in the Thoroughbred code looked down there proverbial noses at Harness Racing as the poor relation with phrases such as ''wobblers'' and ''thieves on wheels'' apparently appealing to their collective senses of humour.

There have been numerous instances of those running the Thoroughbred code attempting to laud it over Harness, sometimes successful and sometimes, due to skilful resistance of our administrators, not.

However, this week has seen the Racing Industry's worst kept secret blossom into the open for all to see. A ''taskforce'' consisting of representatives of the thoroughbred code and the Racing Board have unilaterally decided what is good for the whole Industry and seemingly have no time for any detractors in the other codes who may deem that they do not want to be welcomed?? into the fold.

I wonder, could this report be a reaction to turnover on galloping events dropping at an alarming rate, while harness and greyhound hold their own? Could it reflect concern that if present trends continue harness and greyhound turnovers combined will soon be at the same level as galloping. The cynic in me might consider that this undemocratically prepared report is a sign of panic in those who have, traditionally, been the ''older brother'' by right alone. Let us not forget that while harness pays 98% of it's income back to it's participants in stake-money, the galloping powers that be pay only 89%.

Obviously those involved in this report consider that the present framework is not working, however sound business practices by Harness Racing administrators and, apparently, those in the Greyhound code, suggest that it is working as well as possible in the current climate.

Fortunately we have a tenacious leader in Pat O'Brien who, showing his Irish ancestry, has no intention of rolling over and allowing the bully boys to impose their will on others. He will receive the full support of the Trainers & Drivers Association in scuttling this scandalous report.

Peter T Cook

Kristy McDonald

During Cup Week John Lischner and I met with former HRNZ Executive member and now JCA Board member Peter Smith, for preliminary discussions on the production of a DVD to assist license-holders in the enquiry room.

This initiative, originally instigated by JCA Chair Kristy McDonald at a Trainers & Drivers National Council meeting, is designed to instruct drivers (and jockeys), particularly younger ones, on the correct way to present both themselves and their evidence during a JCA hearing. This will have a number of benefits for all parties involved, teaching an understanding of the procedures and the respect that should be afforded JCA panel members, and also advise drivers what they can and cannot do to defend their charge. Obviously, in many cases having just taken part in a race, some drivers, particularly inexperienced ones, are often ill-prepared to front up to Stipendiary Stewards and the JCA and offer rational and unemotional evidence. While that may always be the case given the personalities of some license-holders, the planned DVD will at least offer those people some confidence on how to conduct themselves.

There were a number of issues to be resolved before production can begin, including the format, cartoon or people (a live version was preferred), who would produce the DVD (Trackside would be approached), and would actors or real drivers be used. It was felt that the use of real high-profile drivers would be preferable as other horsemen and women would be able to relate more easily and take more notice if they recognised the participants. The other matter to be determined was the difference in enquiries involving galloping and harness racing – hopefully this could be catered for by producing break-outs from the basic format for each code.

A Committee has been formed to oversee the production of the video and this would consult with two senior horsemen to determine the format and content of this worthwhile initiative.

Peter T Cook

Early South Bay!

Once again the powers that organise the weather smiled on South Bay on Marlborough Anniversary day to welcome the hoards of people who make their annual pilgrimage to the Kaikoura Trotting Clubs big meeting. (Just a few more than in the picture taken a few years ago!)

As usual the stakes were sensational, the racing was tight and spectacular and it offered the opportunity for the public to experience the thrill of seeing horses thunder past a close range while enjoying a picnic atmosphere. Seeing the large number of young people there, I couldn't help hoping that experience will stay with them in future years and they will look upon harness racing as something they want to enjoy and be involved with.

The big bonus for trainers this year was the superb new stable blocks that the Club had promised the Trainers & Drivers Assn last year. They were well constructed, with the advantage of being much wider than the normal boxes, and some were even lucky enough to be facing away from the goings on that can upset some horses. I have written to the Club thanking them for their efforts.

Peter T Cook

Addington CEO Shane Gloury once again came along to the latest Branch meeting, outlining various aspects of plans for Cup Day, including a food van for license-holders behind the stables, horses being introduced as they step onto the track, the need for licenses to be presented to gain access to the stables and the fitting of rubber mats in the stalls.

He also floated the idea of introducing a ranking system for NZ Cup nominees, similar to the Interdominions and Melbourne Cup, so that connections knew what they had to do to gain a start in the race. This concept was received well by those present. Other matters discussed with Shane included the method of parading horses on the track, the unfortunate image of drivers in bars in driving gear, and countdown clocks.

General matters discussed included the performance of Clerks of the Course in recent incidents, a report from Rob Lawson on a preliminary meeting on the new JCA Guideline Book and a request for ideas on the DVD being produced by the JCA, disappointment at Amateur events being scheduled for the middle of workout programmes and also just prior to the Ashburton Flying Stakes, the improvement in the Addington track, Evolution sulkies, and various incidents involving Stipendiary Stewards.

There was also discussion on phone nominations with those present being in favour of retaining this form of entering a horse. Anthony Butt suggested that using modern technology, calls could be recorded in case of any disputes. There was also dismay expressed at drivers not being permitted to drive outside horses at trials when they have their own horse engaged. A submission to have this changed would be made to HRNZ.

Peter T Cook

Chairman Peter Ferguson recently presided over the Northern Branch AGM where Northern harness representatives Kevin Smith and Blair Odgers came along to discuss issues pertaining to Alexandra Park.

Peter spoke of the years activities, obviously the highlight for him being the World Drivers Champs in Norway, another successful Awards Dinner (he thanked the late Maurice Payne for his contribution to this event), the recent meetings with Stipendiary Stewards and Starters, and the National Council meeting.

Secretary/Treasurer Dave Neal reported a positive turn around in the Branch finances as a result of the clearing of previous debts from the North/South rugby game. Mention was made of the result of this years event, but that was not dwelt upon.

Blair Odgers spoke of the need for any complaints or concerns from license-holders to be directed through the Association, and he advised that progress was being made in the programming problems with the Cambridge Club.

Other matters discussed included the proposal for the Scratching Substitute barrier system, the blood testing of drivers, fixed odds betting and it's effect on Club turnovers, and Saturday night racing. The latter would need to be fully proven to be advantageous before Northern Harness would consider it, particularly when bookings were heavy for the function centre on Saturday nights. Mr Odgers did, however acknowledge that something needed to be done about dual Friday nights.

Other issues surrounding Alexandra Park included the condition of the drivers lockers, the introduction of a countdown clock in the stables, the condition of the track and the non-use of the conditioner, the upgrading of the truck park, and concern that the Scratching Rule was being abused in regard to Vet certificates. A proposed development of the centre of the Park was also outlined.

All in all a positive and co-operative meeting with plenty of matters to work on

For a while now it has been common knowledge that there has been a marked difference in the strategy and methods employed by Stipendiary Stewards in the Otago/Southland area and the rest of the Country.

Our deep South representative Gordon Lee has long been extolling the virtues of his local Stipes to anyone who would listen, so it was with much interest that the Trainers & Drivers National Council witnessed first hand these differences when Southland Stipe Paul Knowles presented a paper at our recent get-together with him and his associates, outlining the basics and basis of his philosophy.

Paul is of the opinion that it is better to educate drivers by consultation or discussion rather than punish them with fines or suspensions so that there can be some rapport established between the two parties, thereby making for a less confrontational us and them scenario. He maintains that this will lead to more honesty, greater respect and ultimately, better racing. From all reports, this seems to have been successful in the region and gained him plaudits from local horsemen.

Of course, cynics would argue that, of course he would be popular with drivers because he is less likely to hand out punishments at will, however the counter to that is a knowledge that when he lays a charge, it is done with good reason and I understand, more often than not, the driver concerned will throw up his or her hands and plead guilty, thereby short-circuiting the need for a lengthy enquiry.

It will be interesting to see how this develops in time, whether the new and somewhat controversial philosophies will become the norm or the traditional hard line approach will be maintained. Watch this space.

Peter T Cook

October 12 was a significant date in the history of the Trainers & Drivers National Council, in that it was involved in three different meetings in the one day for the first time, from 8am to 4pm. It also marked a change in timing as, instead of having our bi-annual Christchurch meeting on the Monday of Cup Week, when most of the Council have other fairly important matters on their minds like driving in the New Zealand Cup, it was brought forward to coincide with a meeting of the Country's starters, instigated by HRNZ. I'll deal with the three meetings separately

NATIONAL COUNCIL Concern was expressed at the recent approval of the Evolution sulkies, which were considered by many to be both heavy and liable to cause problems with the exposed wheels, thus risking drivers safety. However Stipendiary Steward Nigel McIntyre had trialled the sulky up against a Challenger and reported that he could see no reason why they should not be approved. Later in the day when we met the Stipes, including Nigel, Edward Rennell advised that the sulkies were approved on a trial basis because they fitted all the current criteria. However should problems arise the approval would be reviewed. The various Branch Chairmen outlined happenings in their regions, with the Addington stables and state of the track coming under scrutiny from Anthony Butt who praised the liaison that had been built up with NZ Met. CEO Shane Gloury. The successful North Island Awards night and the frustrations of changes in the Auckland TC staff were covered by Peter Ferguson who also spoke of attempts to address the matter of inadequate lockers at Alexandra Park, negotiations over complimentary programming in the North, and the unlikelihood of a new stable block being available for the upcoming Jewels meeting. Gordon Lee outlined the development and success of the Southland Consortium where 9 of the 14 Clubs in the Otago/Southland region were run by 2 staff members, who handled all aspects of the racing scene in the area. He also mentioned the good relationship that had been formed between horsemen and the Stipendiary in the region. Other matters he touched on included a new tiered stakes regime for maidens in Southland, and a lack of support for the abolition of phone nominations. John Lischner, in his report on HRNZ Executive issues, spoke of changes in the way funds from gaming machines would be used, items of interest from the latest Strategic Plan, the second TV channel, the standard of Clerks of the Course, and a move to improve drug detection methods. He also covered the current proposals being floated to amalgamate integrity based roles (Stipes, Racecourse Inspectors). Under General Business, Anthony Butt questioned the inclusion of removable ear plugs and hoods in the notifiable gear regulations, maintaining that 95% of horses wear them and that they were not performance enhancing. This was later supported at the meeting with Stipes and will be put to the Executive for approval. Saturday night racing was discussed with mixed feelings being voiced. Gordon Lee advised that Southland Clubs were keen to race on Saturday evenings and could do so without lights, and the idea of staggered start times on dual meeting Friday nights gained support. Other matters covered included the Scratching Substitute system promoted by Gordon where balloted horses took the barrier position of scratched horses, (Edward Rennell later suggested that this matter be proposed as a remit at the next Annual Conference), various aspects of starting which would be covered at the later meeting with Starters, and ongoing issues with the claiming regulations. Peter Ferguson suggested a drop back system which was considered preferable to the current situation and would assist in extending the racing lives of these horses.

STIPENDIARY STEWARDS A wide range of topics were covered at this meeting, which was attended by Neil Escott, John Muirhead, Paul Knowles and Nigel McIntyre, along with Edward Rennell. These included regulations surrounding horses being away from their home base for any length of time, where it was agreed that trainers should notify HRNZ if any horse was to be away for more than 7 days. Then after a certain period, to be determined by the Executive, the horse would have to be transferred to another trainer. The Evolution sulky issue had another airing, with a suggestion that all horses should race with standard gear similar to Formula One car racing being rejected due to legal problems with restraint of trade. The level of fines being imposed was questioned, with disparities between the two Islands and heavy fines being imposed on young, lowly paid drivers. (Just as an aside to the latter, I can report that, in a similar way to a civil court, the defendants income and situation can be put forward in submissions on penalties). Neil Escott advised that the JCA Penalty Guide was still being reviewed. Along with the request that ear-plugs should be removed from the notifiable list, a suggestion that all gear worn by any horse be included in race-books was to be investigated. This should assist trainers in avoiding being fined and provide an easy reference. Peter Ferguson led a call for more information and alterations in some of the facilities attached to the on-line nomination system, which Edward Rennell promised to investigate. Paul Knowles presented a paper supporting his philosophy of consultation as opposed to confrontation when dealing with license-holders. He felt that, while this approach had drawn criticism from some quarters, he considered it resulted in benefits for all concerned. He also outlined his role as JCA Liaison Officer. Matters raised by Neil Escott included drivers in their driving gear in racecourse bars, where a common sense approach was agreed upon, countdown clocks for the Addington Stables, where he was advised that the Greater Canterbury Branch were already in discussion with Shane Gloury over their installation, and the still to be finalised schedule of instant fines for minor offences. Edward Rennell outlined aspects of the introduction of alcohol and drug testing for drivers, including the confirmatory blood tests requested by the Association at the HRNZ Annual Conference, the amalgamation of integrity staff with other codes, and the establishment of Racing Bureaux. He also announced that Addington Track Manager John Denton had been employed by HRNZ to undertake an inspection of all New Zealand tracks and act in an advisory capacity. The Council supported this move and asked that local horsemen be involved in these inspections. There was also a suggestion that John be sent to the United States to observe track maintenance methods there.

STARTERS MEETING This one, instigated by HRNZ and attended by all starters from around the Country along with the Stipes who stayed on from their meeting, and HRNZ Chairman Pat O'Brien, featured some robust debate which illustrated the various opinions on starting methods which have been causing problems with consistency. A motion put forward by the National Council to basically eliminate the necessity for horses to stand after they had lined up and approached the tape was carried. It was felt that, providing all horses had clear air to work with and were facing in the right direction, the Starter could let them go. It was stressed by all present that running at the tape would not be tolerated and would be dealt with by the Stipendiary under the current Rules. Another motion that horses alone on handicaps should be allowed to start anywhere across the track was defeated. The use of barrier strands for handicapped horses was discussed, with a resolution that under exceptional circumstances, these could be dispensed with at the discretion of the Starter following consultation with drivers and Stipes. There was much debate on the speed of the mobile gate, with the consensus being that faster is better, especially in the case of young trotters. Any drivers who deliberately hung back off the gate would be dealt with. Other matters covered included the idea of the Clerk of the Course escorting the outside horse towards the gate in mobiles, as is done in Australia, and confirmation that horses sent to the outside for misbehaving should go to the outside of the line they were initially in. Peter Lamb voiced his concern that horses were being entered in races without having had any experience in the starting method of that particular race and were causing problems. A motion suggesting the introduction of a regulation that horses have to trial, whether at trials or workouts, under either stand or mobile conditions prior to be being entered for such races, was passed. John Lischner concluded by requesting ongoing consultation between Starters, drivers and Stipendiary Stewards to monitor improvements in starts around the Country Please not that all the resolutions passed at these meetings are subject to ratification by the HRNZ Executive.

Peter T Cook

Not a lot happening on the Association front leading up to the big day of meetings for the National Council on Monday 12th.

Some dreadful luck for one of the nice guys of the Industry, Greater Canterbury Committee man Dean Taylor had the agonising misfortune to see his potential star pacer rear up at the Ashburton trials, falling on the track and fracturing his skull. Bad enough for that to happen to any horse but for one so promising and owned by Dean and his wife Lesley would be a moment they would never forget.

It is a measure of the man that, when interviewed by the media, his main thoughts were with the horses regular driver, young Andrew Veint, with Dean relieved that his employee was on holiday and therefore not involved in the accident, and making sure he is unaware of it until he returns so as not to spoil his break.

On a more positive note, yet more accolades for Harness Racing's whiz kid, Dexter Dunn as he walks away with Canterbury Sportsman of the Year. Richly deserved as are all his recognitions, and hopefully the dream will continue. He is certainly on track to make it that way. All we need is for the Reactor to sort out his standing start manners and this season will be the sensational one it has promised to be.

Tracks are always under the spotlight for various reasons, and very often the public is not aware of these issues. Hard tracks causing horses to breakdown, sloppy tracks so they can't run properly, shifty ones, too much top, not enough top, and so it goes on. It's a difficult balancing act for track managers and/or caretakers, particularly when the weather is so changeable as it is at this time of the year. There have been a few grumbles about the Addington surface being too hard over the past few weeks with some justification, but we have been in contact with John Denton (arguably the number one Track Manager in the Country) and I can report that, having been put off for a couple of weeks because of the inclement weather, a layer of material has been laid on the Addington circuit this week which should make for a top surface for the first Premier night for the season.

Finally condolences to Association Chairman John Lischner whose Mother passed away earlier in the week.

Peter T Cook

Anthony Butt - Greater Canterbury Chairman Shane Gloury

As is apparently the case with Annual General meetings of various organisations, predicting how many will turn up is tougher than picking this years New Zealand Cup winner at this stage. Last year we had so many license-holders we had a complaint that one attendee couldn't find a seat, this year we scratched round for as much seating as we could beg steal or borrow, and half of them remained empty! However, we take that, rightly or wrongly, to indicate that no-one has any grizzles serious enough to make them come along and voice them. Hey, maybe everyone is being kept informed by the website and don't need to come along. In any case, there were some interesting matters covered, particularly the input from Addington CEO Shane Gloury who has been a regular fixture at our Committee meetings and who earned praise from Chairman Anthony Butt in his Annual Report, for his ''open manner and willingness to listen''. Anthony also congratulated Committee member Dexter Dunn on his well documented success during the past season, and also local trainers Mark Purdon & Grant Payne on winning the Trainers Premiership. John Lischner was also commended for his tireless efforts representing the Association on the HRNZ Executive. The General Business side of things saw Cran Dalgety expressing concern at the level of fines being imposed in young drivers, particularly when stakes and therefore incomes, were decreasing. Other matters touched on included whip rules and possible future changes which the Association will be resisting as much as possible, details of gear notification procedures, nomination closing times, and the approval of the new Evolution sulkies and wheels introduced by prominent owner Robert Famularo. It was hoped that this wouldn't spark a rash of owners pressuring trainers to invest in this very expensive equipment, and the general feeling was that what was between the shafts was far more relevant than how they were designed! Anthony Butt outlined how many American trainers had large collections of sulkies that had come and gone in popularity over the past years. The Evolution sulkies had been approved on a six month trial basis. As previously stated Addington CEO Shane Gloury covered various relevant matters and answered questions. He has been particularly pro-active in promoting the on-course product and offering incentives to larger punters, something that should have happened long ago. This had been reflected in promising increasing turnovers so far this season. The stake decreases were unfortunate but unavoidable, and moves were underway to install gaming machines at Addington as soon as possible so that the Auckland stakes that are supported by a $2 million annual income from their on-site pokies' could be matched. Ýet again, this should have happened long ago, but at least things are moving forward. Various matters pertaining to the stable block were discussed, including the use of the walkway between the complex and the track for trainers to watch races on Cup Day, addressing the problem of horses slipping in the stalls, and the arrangements for float parking on dual-code nights when the new dog facilities are open for business. The installation of ''countdown clocks'' in the stables to warn trainers of the need for horses to be on track was to go ahead, and the idea of parading horses on the Showgrounds bend prior to jogging down the front straight on Cup Day was given the green light. This may involve a makeshift parade ring being installed on the grass area inside the track. The problem of the shadows on the track was once again given a decent airing, with no obvious solution imminent although an engineers report was still awaited. It was decided, however, that starting the trials and workouts at Midday would help alleviate some of the dangers. A request was made for trainers to use the equipment provided to clean the stable stalls before they are vacated – most do this but apparently there are some repeat offenders. You'll know who you are, please clean up your act.....as well as the boxes! Shane also advised that Industry participants would be offered very competitive rates for using the Raceway facilities for any functions they may be organising, stressing that any income from this would go into stake money. All in all a low key but informative meeting, with plenty of issues ot be attended to in the next twelve months. Watch this space.

Peter T Cook

Addington Birdcage

Some of you at the races the other night may have noticed changes in the Addington birdcage – in fact the whole thing is about to basically disappear.

While some may question the wisdom of this, the reality is that with the set-up surrounding the new barn, the birdcage has become virtually obsolete and has not been used for a couple of months, other than to welcome the winners back to the victory dais. Bearing this in mind, the Raceway has decided to put this large area to good use and create revenue on Cup Day that will be channelled into just maintaining the stake levels, even allowing for the recently announced reductions.

Attached is a rough drawing of the proposed layout (forgive the quality), which shows the right hand side becoming an extension of the Lindauer Lawn area, a 5 metre wide walkway in the centre enabling owners and Stewards access to the presentation area and track, and on the left a smaller grassed area for more pre-sold tables. This will be known as the Blanc de Blanc area (yes we can all imagine that it will be dubbed with other names on the day) featuring upmarket champagne. Apparently the 160 tickets sold out almost immediately at $300 per person! The Lindauer extension allows an extra 500 patrons at $70 a shot. This of course doesn't include the extra drink sales.

According to CEO Shane Gloury, this amounts to at least an extra $83,000 in revenue for the Club from the sale of these two areas.

In addition, on normal race-days (well in the Summer anyway) these areas will be available for the general public to gain closer access to the track and the horses, thereby fitting in nicely with the close proximity of the new stables.

Addington is certainly going to be a different place from what it was a couple of years ago!

Peter T Cook

The Offending Shadows The Offending Shadows

To the surprise of no-one the issue of shadows cast by the light poles at Addington Raceway reared it's ugly, and potentially catastrophic, head again at the recent Tuesday meeting.

Race One saw the hot favourite Four Starzzz Art give a spectacular display of leaping (scored 9.1 by the Russian judge) when, despite wearing a shadow roll, he imagined that the shadow on the track at about the 400 metres was a must to avoid. As we all know, a horse jumping into the air wearing hopples doesn't work too well and when it occurs in front of a field of other horses, the risks are increased considerably. Only the fact that the horses behind were still on the bit and some skilled horsemanship by driver, Greater Canterbury Branch Vice-Chairman Mark Jones, prevented a serious accident.

As previously indicated, this is not a new problem. The Association's local Branch has been lobbying Addington Raceway for as long as I can remember (and I've been around for a while – who said too long?) about the shadows cast by the huge power poles and, while there have been meetings with club officials, engineers, stipendiary stewards and anyone else who would listen, nothing has happened.

When new CEO Shane Gloury arrived the subject was raised at one of the regular occasions that he attended a Canterbury Branch meeting, but while he understood the problem and was sympathetic, the cost of any solution appeared, particularly given the fragile state of the NZ Metropolitan Club's finances, to be out of the question. While that is an understandable reality, the Association is still awaiting with baited breath, a horse to react in a similar way to Four Starzzz Art on Cup Day, initiating a chain of events that could potentially turn the Day into a disaster. It has already gone close to happening, just ask Jim Curtin, the driver of Bee Bee Cee in the 1994 New Zealand Cup, or at a night meeting early last season, Mark Purdon, driver of hot favourite Asset Rich.

Obviously the ideal fix would be to replace the old lights and, while that is one the long term agenda, it isn't going to happen overnight. The Greater Canterbury Branch has suggested a short term solution of affixing some form of large cloth or banner to the offending light poles, to at least make the shadows larger and reduce the reaction of horses to the thin lines that are produced currently. The idea has been considered but as yet not moved towards reality.

However there is some positive news. While Tuesdays incident was unfortunate, it may just have been the catalyst to some action. Addington CEO Shane Gloury has had discussions with an engineer and the course electrician regarding possible solutions. I understand that the present towers can be collapsed with the help of a crane, however as this hasn't happened for 46 years, not surprisingly there is some doubt that the mechanism is still operable!

Watch this space for further developments.

Peter T Cook

The second day of the Conference began with a report on the 2009/10 Budget and funding policy, the details of which I won't bore you with here. Suffice to say that, due to a reduction on turnovers, they didn't make very good reading.

That was followed by a summary of the HRNZ Strategic Plan which is also available on the HRNZ website in detail. Points raised during the discussion on the Plan included the importance of the volunteer base, relationships with other Industry participants, the need for integrity at all levels, a suggestion that Clubs pool ideas, investigate ways to increase non-racing revenues, and issue press releases to local media prior to their meeting. A template for the latter was to be developed and made available. The old chestnut of education of trainers in communicating with owners was raised, with John Lischner countering that while some trainers may not be as good as others at this, horse trainers had to be many things to many people and were already multi-skilled.

A presentation was then made on the current issues surrounding gaming grants. It appears that the future may not be as gloomy as at first thought on this, with ways of sorting out Trusts being investigated. The Government had acknowledged that Racing was perfectly entitled to receive money from the Trusts, however some resented that money granted for stakes could be won by overseas owners, and given to Clubs outside the area that the Trust operates. A working party was to be formed to lobby politicians and investigate the type of venue and integrity services that money could be claimed for. The plan was to phase out applying directly for stake money in the next four years.

Kristy McDonald QC gave a presentation on the current and future state of the JCA. While there were concerns at the policy of having two panel members at all meetings, she remained adamant that this would continue. She once again impressed all with her no-nonsense and progressive approach to the JCA.

The Chairman of Harness Racing Australia Geoff Want and his CEO Andrew Kelly then outlined developments in the Industry in Australia. Items covered included the leakage of betting revenue to non-contributing betting agencies and the moves being made to combat them, a radical change to the Australian Handicapping System (available on their website) which includes a drop back provision after 10 non winning starts and a change to the whipping rules from 1 January 2010 with both hands having to remain holding the reins. That will be interesting to watch! This had been introduced as a result of strong political pressure from animal welfare groups such as the RSPCA who apparently received A$83million in donations last year.

This was followed by an excellent presentation, accompanied by a DVD, from our Northern Chairman and recent World Driving Championships representative Peter Ferguson, on his experiences in Norway.

The official part of the Conference followed beginning with the Methven proposal that changes to three year-old concessions in Junior Drivers events be investigated. This was lost. All the other remits put to the meeting were passed with one notable exception which the Association had concerns with. This was the one dealing with Drug and Alcohol testing of horsemen. Northern Branch member and Rules Committee representative Rob Lawson first alerted us to the flaws in the proposed new Rule, and the more it was investigated the more apparent it became that it was a seriously flawed piece of legislation. There were concerns that the minimum level allowed of 100 micrograms was too low and risked catching innocent people who had used medication and some drinks. The official word was that the Racing Board had made it clear that they required this level which was the same as jockeys, despite their body mass being rather different to many of our drivers! The other concerns surrounded the procedures of blood testing and also that horsemen could theoretically, under the wording of the Rule, be tested on or off a racecourse at any time whether they were driving or not. This was obviously a very poorly prepared piece of legislation drawn up by the HRNZ lawyer Chris Lange, who had the audacity to state that he considered some of the changes to be ''a good idea'', and spoke of a common sense approach. That's easy for him to say! He has been instructed to go back and do it properly, and it will be circulated for consideration in the near future.

That ended the Conference after a common sense decision that next years meeting would take place in Christchurch

Peter T Cook

Following the Opening Address by Chairman Pat O'Brien, which featured news of the leakage of $50million to overseas betting agencies and concerns that the Problem Gambling Foundation were threatening to use money that the Racing Industry contributes to them to take legal action against the Trust funding of Racing, the Minister for Racing, Hon. John Carter gave a speech.

On the one hand he gave an assurance that the Government would not permit the current move to prevent racing from gaining money from Gambling Trusts to succeed, at the same time stressing that he expected the Industry to move towards less reliance on these grants. He pointed out that despite racing being worth $1.5 billion to the economy, it was an easy target for critics who perceived those involved to be ''fat cats gambling''. He has requested an Industry vision to be presented to him by the end of August and asked for a change in attitude from Industry participants.

The meeting was then addressed by new Racing Board CEO Andrew Brown who spoke of the importance of a culture in Racing. (This didn't seem to me to fit to well with the recent dismissal of Justin le Lievre from Trackside who was an important part of the culture of Canterbury harness racing! When questioned on this issue Mr Brown claimed that the Codes had been consulted on this move prior to his appointment, however I can assure you that the Association had no prior knowledge and Jim Wakefield confirmed that HRNZ had none either. I did, however, hear that Justin has been offered some form of contract that he is considering – watch this space) Other matters covered by Andrew Brown and TAB Wagering Manager Bill Colgan were the importance of the customer, the urgent need to update the TAB computer network, the threat of overseas internet betting agencies who paid little tax and returned nothing to the local Industry, and the co-relation of wagering patterns and race scheduling. The latter was rather subjective, however, as the discovery that the heaviest betting on night meetings was prior to Pick Six closing was hardly rocket science!

There followed a series of Regional Workshops during which Saturday night racing, the possibility of two Sky Channels in Australia, the claimers controversy (our delegate Anthony Butt advised that a Handicapping Sub-Committee the previous day had decided to retain the status quo with the proviso that stricter programming be enforced), and the standing down of horses under enquiry for drug misuse were discussed. While the latter had support from the floor, Edward Rennell explained that such a move would penalise the owner more than the trainer and that it would be the possible subject of a legal injunction which could exacerbate the situation. John Lischner floated the idea of a three year-old series being established in Canterbury similar to the successful Southland series.

The final period of the day was conducted by Gary Lund of PR firm Brannigans. Five basic subjects were covered, the first of which was administration. Addington CEO Shane Gloury outlined his experiences in Australia and suggested how these could be integrated into New Zealand, including a Central Racing Function (something our Association has been advocating for years. However HRNZ Handicapper Darrin Williams, as he had at one of our branch meetings last year advised that, while it sounded a good idea, the experience of the recent Thoroughbred move to such a concept had proven to be very expensive. Darrin advised that there were 11 race secretaries in the Country and these worked with reasonable economy and competence. He also stressed that a central racing bureau may have the effect of losing many volunteers to the Industry, without which harness racing would struggle to survive. The other matter raised by Shane was a scratching penalty which has also been discussed by the Trainers & Drivers Assn but it was felt that fining the trainer would be a fairer outcome that standing the horse down for a period.

Jim Wakefield spoke on the second topic of governance, commenting on another of Shane Gloury's suggestions that the HRNZ Executive was too big. Jim asserted that the current Executive members performed many tasks that, in Australia were performed by paid staff, thereby saving the Industry money. A statement from Garry Lund maintained that the administration was basically a vehicle for transferring $165 million from the punters to the owners – a slight simplification, but an independent point of view.

Geoff Want (Chairman HR Australia, former journalist and head of Sky TV) then spoke eloquently on the decline of the racing media and the marketing of harness racing. He suggested the setting up of a National Media Unit to build a rapport to ensure positive media coverage, a strategy that had worked successfully for car racing in Australia. The meeting agreed on the importance on being proactive as opposed to reactive in the media.

The final topic was led by John Mooney (Chairman Standardbred Breeders Assn) who stressed the importance of establishing a rapport with politicians, suggesting that with 12,000 individual names involved in harness racing ownership in New Zealand, there were many opportunities to inform politicians of the Industry so that that their support could be gained on important matters.

That concluded Day One. Check back soon for a report on Day Two

Peter T Cook

It seems a long time ago now when the Racing Industry was absolutely flying along, tax rate reductions were in the air and stake levels were going through the roof. Even when the recession started to kick in, the feeling was that we were in such a healthy state that we could ride out the storm.

However the past week has seen some more than worrying, not to mention disappointing trends in where the game is going. The Eureka Trust, in it's wisdom, started the ball rolling by announcing that it would no longer be giving money to racing. There are obviously valid arguments that their money is better off going to deserving youth and sports people, however there are other circumstances involved here. Because it took forever for the Government of the day to put restrictions on the amount of gaming machines that could be installed (plenty of restrictions and high taxation on racing at the time),turnover on racing was decimated by the proliferation of these moronic machines and those silly enough to think that they could solve all their financial woes by pressing buttons. There is no question that, if there were few ''pokies'', Racing in this Country would be flying. There seems little doubt that other Trusts will follow suit in the near future which will have a serious effect on many smaller and even larger Clubs.

The other development emerging in the last few days is the method of cost cutting being undertaken by the new somewhat highly paid boss of the Racing Board. While we all know that, in these troubled times, costs need to be trimmed, the axing of certain Trackside presenters does smell of being 'penny pinching and pound foolish', to use an old English expression. There is no doubt that betting trends are heavily affected by comments of well-informed and respected presenters such as Justin le Lievre, and one has to wonder whether losing his like will result in turnovers falling at a faster rate than they already are. It now seems obvious that we are headed inexorably towards that mind-numbing wall to wall racing scenario we see in Australia with none of the personality or character that our Industry has been based on for over a century.

Heaven help us!

Peter T Cook

Accolades were forthcoming for the current handicapping system when it was announced that to date, there have been 3588 individual starters, more than last seasons entire total. This may go beyond the 93/94 seasons record of 3620.

The NZ Metropolitan Trotting Club plans (subject to approval from the Racing Minister) to reduce the stake for the New Zealand Cup to $1million next season. In addition they plan to run the NZ Free-for-All, Dominion Handicap and NZ Derby for $250,000.

As previously advised beanies and headbands are now permitted under helmets.

The Harness Jewel tests were all clear.

The Racing Board is still considering two television channels. It would appear that some reduction in television activity may be imminent, such as less on-course presenters, and the scrapping of The Box Seat, etc.

HRNZ is looking to eradicate phone nominations – soon only on-line or fax nominations will be accepted.

As from 1 October 2009 claiming horses will only be permitted to race in events specifically for Claimers.

John Lischner

Chairman John Lischner reports on recent meetings:

Wednesday 24 June, two sub-committee meetings, Group Racing and Friday Night Racing Review.

Group Racing; Items discussed were Group Racing Funding Policy and Group Racing Criteria. Submissions were received from individual Clubs suggesting that some of these races are suffering from lack of starters – these will be closely monitored in the future. Periodically this is caused by a standout horse in the nominations eg. Auckland Reactor, resulting in weaker fields. Following some intense debate it has been recommended to the Executive that the Methven Cup and the Central Otago club's Marshall Industries FFA be moved from Listed to Group 3. In addition the Harness Jewels Ruby for 2 year-olds is recommended to be elevated to Group 1 status, and the Cambridge Classic downgraded to Listed and possibly not held. This was a long meeting involving immense detail to study and absorb, with the main focus being to review a discussion paper prepared by the General Manager along with turnover analysis done by an independent consultant Paul Collins, formerly with the Racing Board. This analysis described the impact of the Codes market share under the current ''locked in'' funding base in comparison to a pure domestic share system.

Friday Night Racing; The Auckland, Cambridge and Forbury Clubs were reluctant to consider Saturday night racing due to commercial non-racing commitments, the loss of which could outweigh any benefits. NZ Metro were more receptive given declining turnovers on Friday nights due to dual meetings. It was agreed that before anything could be locked in, a trial period should be initiated. To date, no immediate date has been agreed upon as Clubs have commitments to current bookings. I would imagine the trial period could be looked at in the 2010/11 Draft Calendar. In the meantime it was recommended to the Executive that dual meetings start at different times e.g. One meeting starting at 4:30 – 5pm and the other at 6;30pm. This has to be agreed upon by the Racing Board. For the good of our members and their lifestyle, I personally have reservations about Saturday racing but two issues stand out in my mind. One, we cannot continue to race Auckland and Christchurch on the same night and, secondly, we cannot turn our backs on the fact that turnovers are dropping at a fairly serious rate. We do have to look at all possibilities that may help. The envisaged plan has Tuesday and Sunday meetings remaining, while there would be a meeting somewhere every Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Of course the concern is that the TAB are bound to import other races to fill the gaps. I was pleased that we were supplied with all the relevant papers a week before the meeting!

I also recently attended a meeting at Riccarton park to discuss the need to lobby strenuously politicians to vote against the Gambling Amendment Bill (No.2) tabled on 26 May by Sue Bradford. This seeks to amend the Act by denying Racing Clubs the right to apply for grants for prize money. If this Bill were to pass it would have a devastating and disastrous effect on our Industry, particularly when the Racing Board has indicated that our Funding for the 09/10 season is estimated to be $17million less. If any of you know any politicians, please speak to them. If required, I can fax you a briefing paper. This meeting was attended by Club representatives from all codes. On your behalf I have written to my two local MP's Gerry Brownlee and Jim Anderton.

As an aside, Neil Escott rang me concerned at two issues surrounding the recent accident suffered by Shane Walkinshaw. Firstly the St.Johns officer did not show any urgency in arranging any expert attention, and secondly, Shane apparently indicated he did not wish to go to hospital. He did eventually go to hospital and was diagnosed with a ruptured spleen which is pretty serious. The message here guys, is that if you are in an accident, please agree to receive specialist care if you are asked to, as soon as possible.

John Lischner

Part of the reason behind the setting up of this website is to let members, (ie. Licence-holders) know what the Trainers & Drivers Association does behind the scenes.

There is always a constant flow of telephone calls between National Council members and naturally, at the hub of all this discussion, is Chairman John Lischner. John has long been active in various national organisations, particularly in his former life as a butcher, but he is adamant that nothing has compared to the amount of work and issues he deals with on a daily basis in his present position.

Undoubtedly the most important part of this work is representing the Association on the HRNZ Executive when they meet on a regular basis, and when he receives an agenda that is regularly many centimetres thick, you can see what is involved. And that doesn't include various sub-committees such as Rules and Handicapping thrown in for good measure.

Obviously, some of what is discussed at the HRNZ Board table is in Committee and not for publication here and that is how it should be, but we plan publish a rough outline of matters that have been covered which affect horsemen on this site, so that members can understand what we are about, and that we are aware of current issues. Please understand however, that while your Association can put it's case to the governing body (and often does with some vigour), the democratic process means that we won't be granted all our wishes.

So, just to set the ball rolling the following is a sample of the relevant issues discussed at a recent HRNZ Executive meeting.

1)Drivers licences are now compulsory for driving at workouts unless consent is given by the local Committee. 2)Possible changes to rules governing horses away from home base for long periods 3)A review of drug testing procedures for horsemen and women. 4)Driver and gear notification times set at 1pm two days before meeting date. 5)Rules covering the positioning of unruly horses, various starting procedures, and horses going inside the pylons in the last 600 metres. (More on these issues at a later date) 6)No nomination accepted unless the horse is in a trainers name.

There is currently discussion on the future of Friday night racing, turnovers on which are being badly affected by the duel dates structure - a possible solution being a return to Saturday night meetings – watch this space.

Add to these talking points, funding levels, the proposal to amalgamate some aspects of racing with the Thoroughbred code and a reduction in subsidies for Tuesday racing, and you can see our representative has plenty to think about prior to, and during, his meeting with the harness racing hierarchy.

One thing we should all be very conscious of is the moves to eliminate the funding stream from gaming machines into Racing. Any of you who have the ear of a politician should read the details in this weeks Harness Weekly and make them aware of the effect that such a move could have on the Industry.

Anyone with thoughts on any of the above, drop us a note and let us know your feelings

Peter T Cook

The Patriot The Opposition Another Interview Winning Salute To the Victor, the Flowers? Check out the Hooves

Hi everyone, it's great to be home from the World Drivers Championships in Norway. It was an amazing experience to represent our Country and Harness racing in general in such a prestigious event. I relate it the equivalent of going to the Olympics for an athlete, and that is what it felt like every day we competed. Every race day we were driven around the track in flash cars or horse drawn carriages waving our flags. We would then be individually introduced to the crowd and given flowers, along with a memento from the track or the area we were in. After each race a song from the Country of the winning driver (mine was a Split Enz song) would be played. Someone would take the horse and we would be interviewed, given trophies and, yes, more flowers. Everyone would then have their photo taken with the horse, before the driver jumped back in the cart and paraded up the straight. The crowds, although not of Cup Day proportions, all clapped and cheered no matter who had won.

At the end of each days racing the leading points scorer was deemed ''Driver of the Day'' and again introduced to the crowd, given trophies and, you guessed it, presented with flowers, followed by the playing of the drivers National Anthem. I was lucky enough to be ''Driver of the Day'' after the second round at Biri, which was a very proud moment for the New Zealand contingent.

As far as the racing goes, there is 12 minutes between each race, and all horses are warmed up a couple of races before. Three minutes before race start time, everyone is off the track and the field parades up the straight then back past the winning post to the back straight, where some will pull up to allow staff to rush out and put up head checks, attach poles and generally make sure everything is sweet. From then on drivers keep an eye on the mobile which has a clock counting down the three minutes. When it says ''0'' you had better be there because they are going!

After the race the winner goes for the presentation and the rest get off the track and carry on with their warm-ups etc.. All tracks have grandstands in the front straight and stables along the back straight, so you simply drive off the track as you pull up. In between races it looks like organised chaos, but everyone seems to know what they are doing and there is no stress. One thing I thought was great but I know would have some of our local horsemen going nuts, was that warming up on the track at the same time are Coldbloods, Warmbloods (standardbreds), saddle trotters and ponies. Add to that the conditioner and water truck and you get the picture!

All races are over one mile or 2100 metres and the majority are mobile starts. They do have a type of walk-up start where the horses circle behind each other in different directions at half pace, then all of a sudden they are all in a line and away. If a horse is in front of their mark at the ''Go'' signal, they sound a buzzer and all pull up. These seemed to be mainly for the Coldbloods. We saw one race take 4 attempts to get away but they don't worry about making up time – the next race is run 12 minutes after the last one. Wouldn't suit Trackside!

We drove in 20 races at five different venues all over Norway, namely Bergen, Biri, Jarlsberg, Kristiansand and Bjerke. Two of the events were behind Coldbloods which are a Scandinavian breed of horse, a sort of pony. Most are around fifteen hands high with woolly legs like Clydesdales, and the nice ones are beautiful looking animals with long manes and forelocks. They can only run around the equivalent of a 2.07 – 2.08 mile rate at their fastest, and if they gallop, they don't seem to go any faster. It was quite unusual watching them race.

There are some interesting local Rules, some of which are detailed at the end of this piece. One of topical relevance is that not only are there no whips permitted, but you can do very little with the reins as I found out when I was fined NKr1500 (about NZ$360) in my first drive for ''too much'' rein movement. In New Zealand I would have done for not trying! There is no push out or passing lanes but you didn't really need to worry about that as we were restricted to 10 horse fields. After the first round two horses had galloped and were out of it, then when the pressure went on a number of them began to stop so the field spreads out. The horses show no ''battle'', when they feel as though they have had enough, they just pull up, and with no whip to show or flick them with, that's you, all done! I'm sure New Zealanders would love no whips.....yeah right!

If you gallop more than twice or more than 150 metres, you are disqualified and they announce over the speakers that are spread around the track ''number 8 disqualified'', and you have to pull out of the race and get off the track at the first available chance.

Leading for much of the competition was great but it was pretty gutting stumbling at the last hurdle, however there was nothing I could do about it, the horses were just not up to it. I thought I did really well considering I had two winners paying $26 and $28, and the winning driver had four winners paying $1.80, $2, $5 and $5.

I could go on forever, but just to finish, Norway is a beautiful Country and the people were great. We were looked after extremely well and I could not speak highly enough of our hosts. I had great support from my wife Wendy, along with Steve and Ann Phillips who travelled with us. The texts and messages of support from home were great and it was a buzz knowing everyone was behind me.

It is a small piece of my life I will always remember.

Peter Ferguson

Here are a few of the more interesting Norwegian Rules:

Grounds for Disqualification:

The race must be completed at a sound gait. A horse will be disqualified if it;

1. Gains ground or improves it's position while being off stride 2. Goes off stride more than two times (Don't forget they are all trotters) 3. Fails to regain a trotting gait after being off stride within 100m, or 150m within the first 500m of the race 4. Is off stride while crossing the finish line 5. Inappropriate driving has or is thought to have affected the outcome of the race 6. Is driven outside the track boundaries and thereby improves it's position.

Best Possible Placing:

The driver must always attempt to achieve the best possible placing in a race. It is not allowed to pull up or in any other way try to prevent the horse for winning or being placed.

Driving Rules:

The leading horse must stay in the rail (first lane) It is not allowed to:

1. Drive outside the track boundaries 2. Change lanes after entering the final stretch unless overtaking other competitors (not sure how that works??) 3. Change lanes abruptly thereby disturbing, interfering or holding up other competitors 4. Reduce the speed abruptly thereby causing disturbance or interference 5. Cause disturbance or interference in any way or matter.

Conduct of Driving While off -stride:

While off-stride the horse shall cautiously be pulled wide and away from the other competitors. It is not allowed to pull in towards the rail while off-stride unless trying to avoid a dangerous situation. If the horse while off-stride is being pulled outside the track boundaries, it is regarded to be a non-competitor and is not allowed to re-enter the race. If the horse is disqualified it should be cautiously pulled wide and leave the track as soon as possible.

Ethical Regulations:

Excessive urging, abruptly correcting a horse off-stride, vigorous jerking of the lines (reins), inappropriate conduct in general or loud use of voice is not allowed. During the race the driver must keep one line in each hand and both feet in the stirrups. Use of a whip is not allowed in any circumstances.

Safety Regulations:

1. A helmet must be worn at all times while driving a horse both on and off the track. The same applies to anyone handling the horse on the track. 2. All driving at or near race speed must be performed along the inner third of the racetrack in the racing direction. 3. All driving at slow speed must be preformed along the outer edge of the track in the opposite direction. 4. All turns to change direction must be made clockwise after taking proper safety precautions.

Probably one of the most talked about aspects of harness racing these days are barrier draws and how they will, or have, affected the outcome of a race.

Personally I think that far too much is made of them, particularly by some Trackside presenters, who with boring regularity, use a horses draw to predict how a race is to be run, only to end up with what hens lay all over their face. Sure enough, as we all know, a horse drawing wide in a sprint race is at a disadvantage, however if there is enough speed in the early part of the event, you can often see such horses powering over the top and full of energy when the money is paid out. Personally I am a fully subscribed and paid up member of the ''It's only a bad draw after the race” club, preferring to back a better horse with a bad draw than what I consider to be an inferior one with a good marble. Often helps the price too. However enough of my closely guarded ''Secrets of Good Punting'' theories!

At the recent Trainers & Drivers National Council get-together it was plain that all present (and they're a pretty high-profile bunch) had had enough of the present scenario where, due to scratching of ballots etc, there were more horses on the second row of a mobile than the front. Part of the education of a horse is teaching it to get as close to the mobile gate as possible at the starting point. When the poor animal finds itself stuck out on a limb on the outside of the second row with no horses in front of it, what does it do....it tries to catch the gate. But oh no, this time the dumb driver tries as hard as possible to restrain it and keep it one horse and cart length back, so that he doesn't get pinged by the Stipendiary for starting in the wrong position! This is not only an ugly look but, I am reliably informed, potentially dangerous.

Yes I know this is a hoary old chestnut that's been hawked around at meetings for the past few years with all the reasons in the world dragged up why there is no solution to the problem. Maybe that is the problem, the main focus of the numerous discussions on fixing the situation have concentrated fairly and squarely on why things can't be improved, instead of concentrating on why they can. Let me run out a few of the reasons that I've heard and put them to bed.

1.This is only a Southland problem. Wrong. Take a look at the start of this race from Motukarara in December 2008 (arguably the biggest country harness meeting on the calendar).

http://racevideo.hrnz.co.nz/Videos/2008/12/29/20081229-03510-0256.wmv

This is not an isolated example by any means.

2.Clubs shouldn't include any more than two emergencies. So I gather when faced with over 300 nominations, the Club should exclude your horse, only to experience three subsequent scratchings, and your horse is languishing in it's box with grumpy owners?

3.Punters won't know where there horse is drawn. For years now the Greyhound code have successfully employed a system where the emergencies go into boxes vacated by scratchings. A couple of years ago the TAB introduced the software necessary to indicate where a horse was drawn next to it's name on Trackside and TAB sheets, and this can advised to all interested parties as easily as advice of a scratching.

4.It is important for horses to retain the barrier draws they have when the fields are published. Rubbish. If a horse draws 9 at the gate initially and there are scratchings inside it, then it doesn't start from 9 under the current regime. In fact, just the other night at Forbury Park a horse originally given the nine barrier started from 5 after scratchings. In fact if emergencies are given the draws of scratchings, there will most likely be less movement of the majority of horses overall.

So, know it all, I hear you ask, what is the solution? Well of course, everything these days has to have a label or catch phrase, like boy-racers, road rage, taggers, etc, so I've come up with “Scratching Substitute System” which will no doubt be shortened to ''Scratching Sub” or even SSS if you're really short of time.

Emergencies will be given the last three or four numbers on the card and when there is a scratching they will be allocated, in order of their position in the ballot list, the barrier draw of that scratched horse.

I know it sounds scary but most new ideas do, such as push-out rules, safety vests and passing lanes. Life would be strange without them now. Let the Association have your views on this matter and let's get some positive debate going and fix the matter once and for all.

Peter T Cook

STOP PRESS: If you still need convincing of the shambolic current set-up take a look at the start of Race 7 at Forbury Park on 28 May.