National Council

Yes folks, Spring is upon us, the grass is ''rizzing'' and it won't be long before those pesky birds are waking us up at some ungodly hour with their infernal twittering.

For the harness racing fraternity, it means trainers can head to their stables with a spring (no pun intended) in their step, knowing that their hands won't be numb after gearing up the jog team, and there will be no need to chip the icicles off their noses after fast work. Of course there is the re-emergence of our best horses from their winter hibernation, and the always intriguing build up to that magic week in November. It also means that grass track racing is upon us again.

I suppose New Zealand with it's scenery and open spaces lends itself perfectly to racing on the grass, but I can't help wondering why they don't seem interested in using similar venues in Australia. I recall some years ago they did have a couple of harness races on the Moonee Valley grass track, but they were presumably not deemed a success because they disappeared. It will be interesting, now that our trans-Tasman brethren are seeing nearly all of our races, what they make of betting on grass meetings from ''Nuzoilind''.

Regardless of that, we will continue to bask in the undiluted sunshine (he said optimistically) at places like Methven, Thames, Te Aroha, Motukarara and Orari. Judging by the on-course crowd numbers at these meetings, there is no doubt that there is a definite novelty value to be gained from the variety that these tracks offer, as opposed to the week in- week out fare of hurtling around Alexandra Park and Addington.

Long may these venues continue to thrive, and make our racing a little more interesting than that of our ''big brothers''.

Peter T Cook

Judging by the reaction to the news that Justin le Lievre has resigned from Trackside that I have encountered, I am far from alone in feeling that harness racing has wasted and lost a rare talent.

Knowing the circumstances of his exit makes the situation even more difficult to swallow. At the beginning of last season, Justin was virtually told his services were no longer required by the Racing Board and, with the backing of the Greater Canterbury Branch, I wrote to CEO Andrew Brown asking that he be retained. As a result of that and I assume other submissions, he was kept on, albeit on a reduced basis, yet at the start of this season he has been informed that he would be losing the presenters position at Addington, and be allocated just 16 ''country'' meetings for the entire season.

It is little wonder that he has got the message and resigned, particularly when you consider he found out about his fate at the recent awards night from a private source, before he had been advised by the Board. Subsequent communications before Justin's resignation with Trackside boss Glen Broomhall claim that Justin was ''still an important member of our team'' and that his replacement was ''the best person to present Addington meetings''. I will leave it to the reader to judge the merits of those statements.

At the HRNZ Annual Conference, Racing Board CEO when discussing salaries, stated that he was prepared to pay for quality. It is obvious that this applies only to his faceless executive staff and not to the people that present the product to the public.

On behalf of the harness racing fraternity in Canterbury and New Zealand, I would like to thank Justin for his enthusiastic and devoted efforts in making Trackside so dynamic and pleasurable to watch. He will be sorely missed, and maybe when the current Racing Board regime suffer the same treatment as Justin has recently, he can return to our screens.

The above is in no way a personal reflection on Justin's successor Greg O 'Connor by the Association.

Peter T Cook

Shane Gloury

As is normal this time of year, a number of the Committee are enjoying their Winter holiday in warmer climes so it was a small turnout at the recent meeting. However, as usual there was plenty of meaningful discussion among the ''elite'' group.

It was gratifying to note that our request to have the 10am Monday deadline for drivers for Tuesday meetings adopted by most Clubs, however there were still some delays in publishing notifiable gear in racebooks. HRNZ marketing guru Andrew Morris assures me that this is still going to happen when the computer people have sorted out a few issues. With regard to some pull-down blinds that are malfunctioning and therefore causing trainers to be fined, the official word is that it is up to trainers to ensure that they are working properly. Unfortunately with the fault being somewhat intermittent, this is not as easy as it seems!

While unable to attend the meeting, NZ Met CEO Shane Gloury forwarded a proposal for changes in the stakes structure for racing at Addington. With a few minor suggestions on refinements, this was supported as being a common sense approach, however it is yet to be ratified by the Club's Board, so more to come on that one.

A letter of concern had been received from a member at the practice of some veterinarians of administering the drug Flunixin by means of an intramuscular injection. Apparently this is easier and faster than an intravenous method. Unfortunately the member had endured the sight of the young filly enduring a long and painful death as a result of the IM use. It was decided an approach would be made to the Veterinarians governing body to discuss this matter.

Other matters covered included criticism of those drivers indulging in the practice of hitting the wheel discs with their whip, Amateur Drivers, and a proposal by Mark Jones of a heats and Final series with heats on Tuesdays and the Final on the following Friday. To avoid the arguments around the penalty-free aspects of such a series, the heats could be restricted to Junior Drivers only. It was considered that this would help boost Tuesday fields and also offer a penalty free opportunity for owners.

Peter T Cook

Nearly a full Committee turn-out saw a lively meeting recently, with the addition of Auckland TC Racing Manager Kevin Smith.

Matters up for discussion included increasing the number of doctors available for HRNZ licensing check-ups, Evolution carts, the Junior Drivers Championship points system, and details of the upcoming Northern Awards Dinner on August 28.

GET YOUR TICKETS NOW!

Kevin Smith explained the circumstances surrounding the non running of the G3 Breeders Stakes recently. It was agreed that the best idea may be to move it forward, possibly to Christmas, as it would be disappointing to lose the race. The idea of a heats and final concept was well received, with heats at Cambridge and the final at Auckland, and also put forward was a suggestion that Claiming races should be programmed every week and split into two classes, e.g up to $4k & up to $8k, with the proviso that they be combined if not enough entries. Also the possibility of Junior Claims was to be investigated.

Some concern was expressed by drivers at the state of the Alexandra Park track with suggestions that it was deep on the bends and bumpy in some places. Kevin requested that trainers should nominate their horses for multiple races, even if outside the race conditions, thus giving the Club more options when framing their fields. He also welcomed phone communications about the placement or preference of trainers for their charges.

The matter of countdown clocks was raised, however it was felt that the purchase of these at the moment would be an expensive exercise, and an alternative could be having A.Macdonald announce the time over the stable speakers.

All of the above would be taken back to the Club for consideration.

In conjunction with Ival Brownlee, Kevin presented a Tim Vince proposal of a self-funding addition to the number of races for Amateur drivers. Ival pointed out that, while they were very happy with the present ten races in the North, the proposal would provide additional stake-money for owners and trainers, without taking any money from professionals. It was also hoped that the prospective sponsorship may spill over into the professional tote races. The Committee agreed in principal and the idea was to be raised at HRNZ Board level.

Dave Neal/Peter Cook

Day 1 commenced with an address from the Minister Of Racing Mr John Carter. Although coming across an affable character , Mr Carter's address again lacked substance. The chestnut of Integrity was sounded loudly with a belief that if we could increase our integrity levels then we would be more attractive to the general public and would gain traction in percentage of the betting turnover. To a Trainer involved heavily in the industry and prone to take things personally - I reject this notion. I believe that given that we test ( either blood or urine ) over 2500 horses during the season and only get 5 positive results proves to me that we have sound integrity at trainer level. I will agree that the negative journalism we at times receive does nothing to assist our public persona and maybe this is an area that needs more work .

The Minister is also very negative to Gaming Monies in racing and in my opinion - instead of looking at a positive spin on our legal receipt of gaming funds is trying to quite clearly steer us away them.

Following John Carter was Andrew Brown CEO of The Racing Board. Mr Brown gave an interesting speech which focussed on a survey that had been done which showed that the public perception of racing as a pastime was very low. It made sobering reading to a racing fan and illustrated how we must find a way to heighten our positive profile in the community. It also indicated how we had struggled to keep up with the times as far as youth were concerned and the many entertainment options we have these days . All that aside the Racing Board is still delivering good revenues to our code and to the sport and bear in mind that money is the major funding we receive which predominantly goes back to stakes.

Mr Michael Staissny The Racing Board Chairman supported Mr Brown and he canvassed some flak over political appointments and the general direction of the Board. He is a very talented debater and difficult to argue with.

After Lunch we learnt more about the impressive HRNZ IT systems, had an overview of the Business Plan , a look at the Funding Policy which I was pleasantly surprised with and believe HRNZ should be congratulated on , and had a quick overview of the budget which yet again showed

HRNZ running on a shoestring.

We had an Open Forum on innovation and a numbers of ideas came out of this that may be further looked in to.

Day 2 covered the Regional Workshops - always a good chance to openly and more informally discuss issues. Then we had a report from Geoff Want - Chair Harness racing Australia. Geoff is a great orator however my impression of Australian Harness Racing was that it was not particularly rosy at the moment .

The afternoon had the Annual AGM which was somewhat shortened by the withdrawal of two remits - one concerning the Minor Infringements and this was merely a minor issue and will see this approved prior to November I would think and the second the Invercargill remit concerning the Scratching Substitute Rule. The second item was most disconcerting. The Racing Board refused to allow it to be voted on citing that " this system may cause confusion to punters particularly in Australia". This raised many heckles including ours as we were seconding the Invercargill motion. I debated it with Gerard Boyle in the Regional Workshop and got no satisfactory answers. So in General Business I ,(disgusted with the dictator like way this had been handled ) asked the conference to give us a mandate to take this further by going back to the Racing Board and having the democratic opportunity to discuss the issues with them. The Conference unanimously agreed which was reassuring .

The Owners Association Handicapping Correspondence Item was soundly defeated which was always likely to be the case.

The horse movement remit was passed requiring trainers to notify HRNZ if away from their property ( and in the hands of another licensed trainer ) after 14 days. We supported ( and in fact helped develop) this remit.

Overall as per usual an interesting 2 days with a tremendous amount of good networking done. My overall impression was that HRNZ are doing a very good job ( especially Pat O'Brien and Edward Rennell ) but are continually having to fight political battles against the Racing Board , NZTR or in fact the Racing Minister which is inhibiting our code from moving forward at the rate we would all like. We do not all seem to be trying to move in the same direction.

Rob Lawson

There is little doubt that the Racing Industry tends to lag behind other animal based ones when it comes to research. While I am sure some trainers delve deeply into the scientific aspects of the horses they handle, I'm equally sure that the majority rely on what they have learnt from others in the Industry and/or what they have been doing successfully for years.

That doesn't mean that things can't be improved on and we should always be trying to learn.

The Association has recently been contacted by Elwyn Firth who is the Director of the Equine Partnership for Excellence (no I'd never heard of it either!) He is a very well credentialled veterinarian connected to Massey University, and has, in recent times held four research feedback sessions in the North Island to raise the awareness of his organisation and work. Apparently those that did attend these meetings were positive about them and comments and observations gathered will be used to improve the functions of the organisation.

The following is a release put out following the meetings:

Equine research feedback sessions

During July 2010, Charlotte Bolwell, Sarah Rosanowski, Nikita Stowers and Jasmine Tanner, equine research students from Massey University, organised feedback sessions for members of the industry who had helped them in recent research trials.

The feedback sessions were designed to thank the farms and trainers who had assisted in selected research projects, to provide those attending with some key findings from the projects, and to discuss the implications of the research to the industry. Four sessions were organised, in Palmerston North, Cambridge, Matamata and Karaka. The sessions included short presentations of the research, discussions over afternoon tea, and a booklet that contained brief articles on the projects.

Four themes were chosen for the sessions: biosecurity, nutrition, early rearing environment, and training and racing. The key areas of discussion included the ongoing vulnerability of the industry to an extensive outbreak of Strangles or other infectious diseases, the possible oversupplementation of minerals and energy in the diets of young stock, the effect of training milestones on future racing success, and management of yearlings during a sales preparation.

There was some excellent feedback from the sessions. The talks generated many questions and led to great discussion and exchange of ideas. The attendees stated that the sessions were useful and related directly to their business or operation. The opportunity to present and discuss the early findings of some of the scientific research projects being conducted at Massey should be ongoing. Most important is that the efforts of the industry participants who had been involved were recognised and acknowledged – without their input there would be no data to analyse! As the individual projects progress we look forward to sharing the findings with the wider equestrian community.

I am in discussion with Elwyn and hope to be able to reproduce some of the results of their research on this site in the future. So, as the saying goes...watch this space.

Peter T Cook

The site will not be updated next week as I am taking a break from the real world!

Simon Lawson

For the second year running the New Zealand Junior Drivers Championships was won by a member of the Association's Northern Branch with Simon Lawson following in the footsteps of Zac Butcher.

Simon has fashioned a superb record to date and currently sits on 44 wins for this season to date alone, placing him 17th on the overall drivers ladder ahead of such house-hold names as Brent Mangos, David Butt, Robbie Holmes and Todd Mitchell!

This series provides both a goal for our new generation of drivers, and an opportunity for the Industry to showcase the talent that we are currently blessed with in our ranks of Junior Drivers. It is a measure of the current quality, that accomplished drivers such as Nathan Williamson and Andrew Veint couldn't even make the field!

The only disappointing aspect of the series was the lack of support for the third programmed event, the one-win trot. This was included to offer some variety for the youngsters to display their skills but failed to materialise due to a lack of nominations. While, in the past there has been a feeling that trotters shouldn't be risked in such events, it is hard to fathom why such talented drivers, including after all, the Country's leading reinsman, should be viewed with such reluctance, particularly when a penalty-free stake is on offer.

Peter T Cook

Mark Jones

As the meeting continued the subject of the new Evolution type sulkies was inevitably raised. Mark Jones led the discussion, claiming that trainers would face pressure from owners to purchase the very expensive new sulkies, so they would allegedly retain their edge. He considered that this would not only be detrimental to public trainers but also unfair on owner trainers who could not afford them.

The others at the meeting sympathised with these sentiments, and other suggestions such as the major clubs purchasing a set of carts to be used by all on their tracks were floated, however the reality was that if anyone wanted to use a different sulky, provided that it fell within the criteria in place (which the Evolution's do), any relative legal action to support them was bound to be successful. They had been tested by the Stipendiary Stewards and senior drivers, and would simply have to be accepted as progress and part of life.

Subsequent to the meeting, the Branch has been in discussion with a local engineer with a view to producing a similar cart locally, and these talks are currently on-going.

Other matters covered off were, mixed reactions to the idea of adopting the Australian scenario of only relegating horses if the horses that they have interfered with finish in the first 5 places, clarification of the rules governing the inspection of horses (it was acknowledged that the Stipes were pretty flexible on this) the HRNZ Budget, concern at 2 & 3 horses running round in trials because only one horse can be transferred to another heat, disappointment at the new Racing Board appointment, and concern at the standard of driving in recent Amateur tote races at Addington.

Chairman Anthony Butt and Vice-Chairman Mark Jones floated a radical proposal to sell off at least part of Addington Raceway and establish a training facility on the outskirts of Christchurch, which would eventually become a racing complex with a new track. Their idea was backed up by the fact that the Public and Twiggers Stands were both past their used-by dates and, believe it or not, even the ''new'' white Stewards, members and officials stand was 22 years old!

They suggested that a new complex could include a sports bar, training barns for young trainers, and a function centre. The old stable area could be sold to finance the project, and now was an ideal time to begin such a move. Food for thought from two of the sharper thinking guys in the game.

Peter T Cook

The final meeting of the season saw a variety of topics covered, and with a full turnout of the Committee it turned out to be one of our longer meetings. For that reason I'll deal with what was discussed in two parts

First up was a report from HRNZ Track Manager John Denton on our request for pylons and a passing lane to be installed at Motukakarara. It appears there are problems with the arms of the mobile gate being very close to the fence lines when fully extended, however the matter was being pursued with hopes of some form of compromise. John had also done some work on the Blenheim track prior to the last meeting there and reports were positive. He will be returning there for more upgrading later this year. The Committee felt that John was doing an excellent job in his new role and good lines of communication had been established between him and the Association.

The Branch found it difficult to understand why there should be resistance from anyone at the suggestion that Tuesday drivers could be declared at 10am on a Monday, however Otago/Southland Branch Secretary Jason Broad was to discuss the matter further at the upcoming Racing Managers Conference.

The current situation surrounding gear notification drew further dissatisfaction with still no gear lists in the race-books (hopefully by now that will be rectified), and also trainers were being fined for some pull down blinds malfunctioning when they have an obvious design fault (the blinds that is!).

The proposal by the Owners Association to change the current Handicapping system was considered but the consensus was that while no system was perfect, the present one was having the desired effect of higher numbers of horses starting, fewer younger horses being sold overseas, and very few complaints. The only major concern seemed to be a lack of one win only, or one and two win races for trotters, so that was to be raised with Handicapper Darrin Williams.

Mark Jones and Anthony Butt reported on their meeting with the Christchurch City Council Sub-Committee over the gaming machines for Addington. While they were not optimistic that the license would be granted, there had been an ''olive branch'' of sorts offered suggesting that other assistance may be available. Time will tell!

Anthony also reported on a meeting he had had with Addington CEO Shane Gloury to discuss ways of improving matters at the Raceway. These included reducing the stakes for penalty free Junior Drivers races, paying a larger percentage of the stake to winners of low stake races such as Tuesday events, and options surrounding the NZ Free For All on Show Day which had suffered in the past couple of years. A suggestion of the introduction of an invitation system similar to the Miracle Mile was not thought practical as it would not make the horses any more available. The Committee thought that the problem was a result of the Cup becoming a much harder and faster race recently. Other issues at the meeting covered were more regular workouts at Addington, and a request for the programming of more two year old races, particularly for fillies.

To be continued.

Peter T Cook

Peter Ferguson

Major issues to be covered at the recent Northern Branch meeting included concern that Junior Drivers who move from one Island to the other should not carry their points earned into the Junior Championship ladder, thereby possibly disadvantaging the local youngsters, (HRNZ have promised to look at this situation in the future), and the recent canning of the G3 $30,000 Breeders Stakes at Auckland. The club has been requested to provide an explanation.

A move to have pylons installed at all tracks, including grass, in the North Island was well underway, and it now appears that funding is being sought to cover the cost of this across the Country. More on this as it develops. The Branch felt that no drivers should be posted for horses until they are confirmed, as the common practice of putting up last drivers was creating confusion. Also the notifying of gear changes for two day meetings was still causing problems. Dissatisfaction was voiced at the limiting nature of the list of doctors provided by HRNZ which were registered for a medical check-up. The Branch could see no reason why any registered doctor could not be used, especially as fees tended to vary considerably.

Various aspects of the recent National Council and Stipendiary Stewards meetings were covered off by Peter Ferguson and David Butcher, and concern was expressed at aspects of the new Evolution sulkies including their availability to all trainers.

Aspects of the issues surrounding trusts and Club funding were discussed, and it seemed obvious that many of the Trusts were wary of making payments to racing as a result of recent controversies.

Nominees for categories at the upcoming North Island Awards were called for, and it appeared that M.Walton was to become the Clerk of the Course for Cambridge.

Peter T Cook

While there are slim hopes that a vote of the entire Christchurch City Council might overturn the ruling on not giving Addington their gaming machines, it is probably a 100-1 shot now.

I was interested in a couple of comments made at the hearing by Graeme Ramsey, Chief Executive of the Problem Gaming Foundation. One of the quotes attributed to him was, ''We are seriously concerned that the solution to their problems is pokie machines and wonder what other alternatives have been considered.'' That would suggest how little attempt he (and one or two other critics) have made to investigate why the NZ Metropolitan Club is in the situation it is in. Admittedly there have been some unfortunate decisions made in the past that are now coming back to bite the current administration, but let's not forget that, because the construction company involved went belly up, the cost of the superb new stabling facility went through the roof by millions of dollars– hardly the Club's fault.

Also, anyone who has been to Addington lately (or even watched races there on television) might have cast an eye over the buildings that have sprung up along the back straight, all built on land leased by the Club, and which is already bringing in income which will only grow in the future. Yes, it is probably fair to describe the desire for pokies as a ''band-aid solution'', but that is only similar to an ambulance driver treating an injury so that the patient can survive until the hospital is reached. That treatment is still essential to the patient's welfare and possible survival.

The other point that Mr Ramsey referred to was the ''problem of declining interest in racing.'' Given that is the case, I would hope that he will be recommending a proportional reduction in the levy that the Racing Board pays annually to him and his Foundation, which last year reached $1.5million. Since this percentage of gambling turnover amount was set, the pokies have grown in popularity at, of course, the expense of horse racing. Seems we are in a lose - lose situation!

As you will now be aware, the remit to establish a Scratching Substitute System is up and running, and apart from a couple of queries that have been answered satisfactorily, support for the change appears to be gathering momentum. Details of the proposal can be found in an article elsewhere on the site.

Peter T Cook

John Lischner

Unfortunately a great deal more time was spent on discussing the One Racing Report, however it appears the resistance to this proposal from the Harness and Greyhound codes has finally succeeded, as even the Racing Minister appears to have lost interest in it.

We did receive a presentation from the Racing Board of it's new Strategic Plan, however some old hands felt that they had seen it all before! It appears that momentum is gathering for the Tri-code Integrity Unit, but in the form of an independent body, separate from the RB.

The Association is pushing for driver notification for Tuesday meetings to be changed to 10am on Mondays which we imagined would suit everyone including the Secretaries, who could have Sundays off. Although it was not supported at the Executive table, our Otago/Southland Branch Secretary, who is also heavily involved as a Race Secretary, has offered to pursue the matter at the upcoming Racing Managers meeting.

Unfortunately there is to be an increase in fees with the advent of GST, Open Horsemans and Public Trainers licences rising by about 38% inclusive.

An interesting idea that is going to be further investigated is a Harness 7's concept, in other words a short time frame twilight race meeting consisting of seven races in two hours. Just goes with the modern idea of short attention spans!

The Association wishes to farewell Jim Wakefield from the HRNZ Executive. Jim has been a tireless worker for the benefit of the Industry, well respected and influential in Government and taxation circles, and was instrumental in rescuing Harness Racing from those dark days of $2000 races and other obscenities. The Association had quite a deal to do with Jim's introduction to the governance of the Industry and we are proud to have been so. We wish him well in his future endeavours and look forward to seeing him and Susan in the winners enclosure for many years to come.

Just as an aside from the Executive, have heard some comments regarding the pokies for Addington petition suggesting that we should be able to do away with such support for moral reasons. Perhaps it would pay to recall that,before the proliferation of these machines, racing had around 60% of gambling turnover, now it has about 20%. Before pokies there was minimal problem gambling, now there is an organisation (partly funded by the Racing Industry) to support such people.

On the other issue surrounding City Councillors being openly invited to Addington, perhaps Sue Wells should have a chat to the Chinese Vice President who was recently wined and dined by our Government. Is it possible they might want something in return?

Also, maybe you can recall the generous predictions of the Smokefree organisation which was going to replace all the sponsorship that Racing lost from the ban on tobacco advertising. Where are they now?

John Lischner/Peter T Cook

The HRNZ Rules Sub-Committee met recently to consider a raft of items, including a number of matters put forward from the Association's recent National Council meeting.

One that didn't result from that gathering was, as here predicted last week, the situation of one noisy punter writing to the Racing Minister and managing to overturn a decision made by a room full of Industry experts last October. Unfortunately, as a consequence, the trainers of the 90% of horses that wear them, will now have to notify removable ear-plugs on their gear lists. The message is clear here, if you have a gripe with HRNZ and appear to be getting nowhere, just drop a line to the Minister!

On the positive side, unlike Australia, the whipping rules will remain as the status quo (and will be rigidly policed), Canterbury Clerk of the Course Dave Ferriman has been asked to consider the Australian criteria for this position and will consult on which of these can apply to NZ, and not guilty charges will no longer be shown on a drivers record.

A new drug/breath testing regime is being introduced where drivers who are found to have a level greater than 100 micrograms (0.02%) will be required to undergo a further breath test after a minimum wait of between 10 and 30 minutes. This will also cover stablehands etc, who present themselves to drive a horse for any purpose on a race track. The thing to watch here is being aware of residual alcohol in the system after a few drinks on the middle day of a two day meeting like Nelson or Blenheim.

Another issue that the Association pushed for was a change in the horse movement policy. Here we had partial success, with rule being changed so that a horse can be away from it's base establishment for up to two weeks, then the trainer must fill in a Horse movement notification form. Doing this will permit the horse to be away from home for three months (why they couldn't just make it open-ended is anyone's guess, but it's an improvement on the previous slightly farcical situation). Incidentally, travel subsidies will no longer be paid to horses racing at either Addington or Alexandra Park.

Other matters discussed by the Sub-Committee included abuse of officials to now include veterinarians, Club officials and HRNZ employees, the definition of a syringe/needle will stay as is, telephone nominations will remain for now, and senior trainers (as well as drivers) will now be permitted to assist Juniors in JCA hearings.

For some strange reason the matter of wearing beanies re-surfaced, but common sense prevailed again and they will continue to be permitted. Incidentally the white one that Dexter wears, (which personally I think is brilliant) was obtained from Sean McCaffrey.

John Lischner/Peter T Cook

There is good news on the horizon for those trainers who have contributed to the windfall of approximately $20,000 to the HRNZ coffers since April last year for either not having the notified gear on a horse, or presenting it wearing something that wasn't notified.

There is the obvious argument that a trainer should know the pieces of gear that his or her horse should have attached to it, however when guys like Mark Purdon/Grant Payne and Cran Dalgety, trainers renowned for their attention to detail, are being fined on a regular basis, it would suggest that there could be improvement in the system needed.

The Association has been pushing for nearly twelve months to have the gear that is supposed to be worn on a particular horse included next to it's name in the printed race-books, so that in the heat of a race night, trainers have an easy and convenient reference to go by, thereby leaving virtually no excuse for errors. For some time now, there has been a deal of hassling of the Racing Board (who distribute the information included in on-course race-books) by the staff at HRNZ to have this happen, after all the information is readily available on the HRNZ website. I am now reliably informed that the Board has finally got it's act together and this information concerning gear will be in the race-books in a matter of days.

That's the good news, however there might be a slight dark cloud mixed in with the silver lining (or something to that effect). As a result of one punter writing to the Minister of Racing, the HRNZ Executive is likely to re-introduce removable ear-plugs to the list of notifiable gear at it's meeting this week. This despite the fact that, at a meeting last October between the some of the Country's leading drivers, the Stipendiary Stewards and the HRNZ General Manager, it was unanimously decided that this piece of gear need not be notified by trainers as 90% of horses wore them, it in no way enhanced the performance of a horse, and certainly wouldn't make them go faster! But hey, what do they know! In addition, an approach to probably the highest profile professional punter in NZ found that, while he considered some gear changes to be important information, he took no notice of whether a horse wore ear plugs.

I know the punter has to be looked after, heck I'm one too, but to have one of them overturn a considered decision of arguably the most qualified experts in the field is setting a dangerous precedent.

Peter T Cook

Just a few matters that have come up following our recent round of meetings. First of all, I understand that some ''punters'' have taken exception to our Association voicing concern at the request that Trackside commentators refrain from making uninformed comments about incidents during a race. To clarify what was meant, the reason for that request, which was subsequently acknowledged by Trackside management, was not that drivers are too precious to stand criticism, but simply to prevent ideas and scenarios being put into the mind of punters when the facts may be totally different. Such instances can cause embarrassment to both the drivers and the Stipendiary Stewards who, because of some of the cuff comment, may be seen to be not taking appropriate action.

The Greater Canterbury Branch has received a letter from the Marlborough Club advising that they are aware of the problems that were experienced at the last meeting with their track, but deciding against the banking of the last bend, suggesting that the cost was prohibitive for four race-days.

Speaking of tracks, we have complimented Addington Track Manager John Denton on his efforts during the past week, maintaining a superb racing surface through what has been one of the most trying weeks weather-wise he is likely to encounter. Last week we saw a New Zealand record, and for meetings both last Tuesday and Thursday the track has been in fantastic order. It appears that the secret to the perfect all-weather track has been found and hopefully John can impart his knowledge around the Country in his role as HRNZ Track Supervisor.

During the next few weeks meetings are planned with various parties to explain the background and logistics behind the remit being put to the HRNZ Annual Conference by the Invercargill HRC to introduce the Scratching Substitute System (see previous article on this site). The remit has now been extended to include standing starts in the proposal. The Association will be lobbying Clubs hard prior to the Conference, particularly so that the delegates actually understand the reasoning behind the move. Anyone who thinks that there is no problem, or that is purely a Southland issue might want to have a look at tapes of races 3 (5 on the front row and 6 on the second) and 10 (4 on the front and a ridiculous 8 on the second row) at the Timaru HRC meeting on 16 May.

Peter T Cook

Anthony Butt

Despite an eleventh hour proposal initiated by Branch Chairman Anthony Butt to include a set of heats at Ashburton, a vote among the NZ Metropolitan TC Board resulted in a retention of the two heat format for next year's Interdominions. It is a disappointing result for the Association, and we believe for the series after the majority of horsemen had supported three heats, but in the end the current financial situation and the possibility of a substantial loss was the deciding factor. There are serious concerns held about the future of the series following the Perth 2011 edition.

Addington CEO Shane Gloury was once again in attendance at our recent meeting, and as well as explaining the circumstances surrounding the above decision, questioned the suitability of running more regular workouts at Addington. This met with full support, and a further suggestion of conducting qualifying trials in conjunction with the workouts was voiced. More on this soon. Other matters covered with Shane included the method of doing pre-race preliminaries, the availability of the Caduceus bar following the races, and the issue of rentals for the greyhound meetings which will be significantly increased in number next season.

A review of the recent National Council meetings was given by John Lischner and Anthony Butt, and further meetings with the Stipendiary Stewards in conjunction with their Annual Conference had involved working through the Penalty Guide and discussion concerning notification of gear, the appointment of an overseer to assess Clerks of the Course, high bicarbonate readings, and horses away from their home stables for a period. As a result, many of these issues are being referred to the HRNZ Rule Sub-Committee for approval – I will advise on the outcome later. It has been a very productive and beneficial couple of weeks in the Associations dealings with the Stipes, and there is no doubt that this dialogue is beneficial to all parties concerned and the industry overall.

Other matters of interest from the Branch meeting included questioning the value of drivers other than the accused fronting at enquiries when in for instance, Rugby League, this is not necessary, Amateur drivers canvassing trainers for trial drives to obtain graduation licences, the merits and otherwise of Evolution sulkies, and the recording on a drivers record of charges that were not proven. The first and last of the above items have been referred to the JCA and the latter to HRNZ.

Peter T Cook

Immediately prior to the recent National Council meeting, we had another of our regular chin-wags with representatives of the Stipendiary panel, this time the Northern crew along with Chief Neil Escott. Unfortunately Edward Rennell was unable to attend due to a funeral.

As always there was a frank and forthright exchange of views, and while neither party gets all their own way, it is healthy that such an opportunity arises to air opinions.

There was, of course, talk of the proposals of a Shared Integrity Unit and it is obvious that there is a fair bit of water to go under the bridge before anything happens there, if at all. All present agreed to send congratulations and endorsement to Edward Rennell and Pat O'Brien for the huge effort they have put in involving the One Racing Report.

In the next few days, Greater Canterbury Branch Chairman Anthony Butt will meet with stipes representatives to thrash out suitable penalties for the ''Top 40'' most common charges, so they can be in included an updated Penalty Guide. This will be an ongoing task until the Guide is fully updated.

Other matters touched on included the method of how trainers and drivers were questioned regarding the performance of their respective horses, speed duels and why they were not simply considered part of a race, how it was determined that a horse was or was not galloping over the line, and a request for leniency for maiden and 1 win trotters, particularly when they were racing against more experienced horses.

The contentious gear notification Rule was given a going over and all agreed that a horses gear should be published in the race-book. Hopefully this would happen sooner rather than later. In addition, the Association is recommending that a space be provided on the ''Change of Trainer'' forms to indicate whether the new trainer would be using the same gear as previous or starting with a ''clean slate''.

Rule 823 covering horses away from their home stable was discussed, and the Association was asked to submit our proposal for consideration, which has subsequently been done.

Drivers were asked to advise the Stipes at the start of a race-meeting if they have travel commitments which might if they affect them being available for a later enquiry, and the unsatisfactory situation involving races being held up due the fourth horse being under enquiry and Australian ''First Four'' payments being affected was touched on. Apparently due to the old equipment being used across the Tasman, they can't manage a part-pay situation. The Stipendiary are as frustrated as punters about this, and are working on a solution.

Other matters discussed were the recently obtained Training Manual for Clerks of the Course, commentators pre-empting race interference and incidents, thereby influencing the punter that something had happened when it may not have, and a need for all concerned to project integrity to the public.

Once again the meeting was a very worthwhile exercise.

Peter T Cook

Another edition of the bi-annual National Council meetings was kindly hosted by the Auckland Trotting Club at Alexandra Park recently.

This was preceded by another meeting with the HRNZ Stipendiary representatives, details of which will be covered in a later report.

There were many varied matters up for consideration by the National Council, some dealt with previously and some new. Some of the ''old chestnuts'' included the installation of pylons on grass tracks, the introduction and testing of Evolution sulkies, changes to the handicapping conditions for Claimers races (which are to be submitted to the HRNZ Handicapping Committee), the pros and cons of Saturday night racing, and the standard of standing starts.

Other issues that had been touched on before in previous meetings were the pros and cons of telephone nominations, the Scratching Substitute (or Bulls-eye) System for arranging barrier draws, support for which is gathering momentum around the Country, and gear notification rules. It is hoped that details of a horses gear will soon be included in race-books thereby assisting in eliminating the regular fines that members have been incurring over the past twelve months, totalling approximately $18,000. There was also consideration of the criteria for choosing candidates for Junior Driver Championships, a strong feeling that such candidates should honour their commitment to the Championships, and a proposal for selecting participants for future World Drivers Championships, based on calling on expressions of interest and alternating between Islands. There were also questions raised as to the value of standing a horse down without trialling.

Work was to be done in conjunction with the up-coming Stipendiary Stewards Conference, on the setting of penalties for the ''Top 40'' most common charges, and a request was to be made to HRNZ to circulate the recently obtained Australian manual for Clerks of the Course to all Clubs in an effort to improve the standard of these officials.

Other proposals that were to be put forward to HRNZ for consideration include clarification of the difference between a needle and a syringe, standardisation of driver notification times to include Sunday meetings, and questioning why a driver should have a charge on his record despite being found not guilty.

John Lischner was unanimously re-elected as the Association's representative on the HRNZ Executive for another term.

Peter T Cook

Over the past few years passing lanes have been a regular subject of debate and the odd controversy, however even the most diehard of opponents (and there were plenty among the Association's Committees – and secretaries) have come to terms with their introduction, providing they are properly designed.

There are still some passing lanes that are badly set up, in particular the Alexandra Park edition which, as you will see if you watch a tight finish at that venue, becomes narrower as you approach the finishing line!

Fortunately the powers that be at Addington Raceway (and subsequently Ashburton) consulted with the Greater Canterbury Branch before proceeding along these lines and the results are two superb lanes, very often wide enough to fit two or even more horses through if the leader drifts out. Not only that but it also opens up gaps further out on the track, thereby accomplishing what the passing lanes were introduced for in the first place, allowing all horses to get a gap to show their worth.

Following the recent meeting at Motukarara, it was noted in the Stipes report that no less than 15 horses were denied a run in the straight, so the Greater Canterbury Branch has subsequently written to the Banks Peninsula club urging them to install a passing lane. On the grass tracks, as has been demonstrated on some North Island tracks, this can easily and cheaply achieved by the installation of temporary pylons. Hopefully this will come about, and be followed by all Clubs so that we don't have the current unsatisfactory situation where punters have to check each different track to see whether there is a lane or not.

Next Friday (7 May) sees another bi-annual get together of the Association's National Council in Auckland, along with a regular meeting with the Stipendiary and Edward Rennell, to discuss relevant issues.

Agenda items for the National Council to consider include criteria for Junior Drivers Champs, the definition of a needle, Interdominion format, speed duels, Clerks of the Course, gear changes regulations, phone nominations, and the bulls eye barrier draw system, among many others.

Reports on these two meetings will be published on this site over the next two weeks.

Peter T Cook

Heart Rate Graph

Recently a group of boffins from Massey University asked HRNZ and the Association for permission to test some drivers to ''quantify the physiological stress levels of harness driving on race day, and the physical fitness of professional harness drivers.''

This was duly okayed and the other day we received a preliminary report of recent tests done on drivers at the Manawatu Raceway. Most of the data collected so far has focussed on the heart rate of drivers during the race, and it makes for interesting reading.

What these guys did was use an on-board heart rate monitor for the duration of the meeting. What they discovered apparently surprised them. They found that the drivers normal average heart rates during the day of around 110 beats per minute (bpm) rose significantly to around 147 bpm during the race and soared to up to 219 bpm at certain parts of a race, (at the start and finish). This is illustrated by the graph they supplied on the right.

While this may be scientific gobbledygook to you and I (well me anyway), they found it very interesting, and when they offer a layman's explanation (following), the reasons their enthusiasm become clearer.

''Whilst heart rate is not a direct measure of physical stress, it does provide an excellent indication of cardiovascular stress. What our data shows is that the cardiovascular stress experienced by harness racing drivers is comparable with that of sports people in what are outwardly more physical sports. It also allows us to speculate that improving cardiovascular fitness may help improve the performance of the driver, and certainly that persons with cardiovascular disease should be wary of competing.''

So what they are surmising is that, the fitter you are the better your driving, and if you've just had a row with the wife, girlfriend or mistress, stand yourself down for the night...well something like that anyway.

We'll keep you updated with further results.

Peter T Cook

Hon John Carter - Racing Minister

While it has been a relatively quiet week on the Trainers & Drivers front, it has been anything but for those in the corridors of power at Harness Racing New Zealand. As reported on this site a couple of weeks ago in John Lischner's Executive Report, the harness and greyhound code leaders were asked by the Racing Minister to come up with an alternative to the One Racing Report in a fraction of the time it took to prepare the original document.

It maybe that the Minister thought that this was beyond the realms of possibility, however the two codes, with our side led by Chairman Pat O'Brien and General Manager Edward Rennell, have risen to the challenge and produced a report that not only exposes the original One Racing report for what it was, an ill-conceived attempt by the Thoroughbred code to take control of the Industry, but offers not one, but two fair and workable alternatives.

While it might seem a rather heavy and long-winded tome to many, the alternative report, now posted on www.hrnz.co.nz, is well worth a read for those who have an interest in the future of our Industry.

The report stresses that it is a basis for future discussions, this time involving all the codes and not just one, so it will be interesting to see the response from the Minister. Hopefully the more rational and factually based document will persuade him that the previous one presented by the Thoroughbred code and a few of it's high profile colleagues is not the way to progress the Racing industry in this Country.

Congratulations and appreciation must go particularly to Edward, for the work that has been done on this, thus hopefully avoiding a potentially disastrous turn of events.

Peter T Cook

The Franklin Trotting Club clubrooms was, as usual, the venue for a recent meeting of the Associations Northern Branch.

Progress was being made on the refurbishing and possible expansion of the male and female drivers room at Alexandra Park, and negotiations were continuing on the purchase of a countdown clock for the stables at the same venue. Those present were impressed with the criteria that had been circulated regarding the role and training of Clerks of the Course, and further support was given to the introduction of the so-called ''Bulls-eye'' barrier draw system.

A number of items were to be added to the agenda for the upcoming National Council meeting in May. These included the Australasian Junior Drivers situation, clarification of injections, the Interdominions format, and the publication of gear notification in race books. Also the issue of phone nominations was discussed and also referred to the National Council.

The current matter of the case involving N.Chilcott and M.McKendry being charged was discussed at length, with opinions on who should be more to blame in such situations being voiced. Further discussion on this matter would take place at National Council level.

A push to have all grass tracks fitted with pylons and a passing lane was to be instigated by the Branch and approaches would be made to all the Clubs involved along with HRNZ.

Concern was expressed that race conditions were being changed, with little notice being given to trainers so that they can enter horses. This situation would be monitored.

Other matters tabled at the meeting included commendation for the Franklin Club for running extra races at Pukekohe during Cup Week, late publication of trial fields, and frivolous and unfounded charges being laid, such as a trainer being charged with late presentation of a horse due to officials being unable to find a cap cover. The latter would also be brought up at the National Council meeting.

Dave Neal/Peter T Cook

Simon Lawson

Regardless of the outcome of the current Australasian Junior Drivers Championships, harness racing in New Zealand is currently blessed with a surfeit of riches when it comes to talented young reinspersons (if that is the word). While Dexter Dunn has become almost a house-hold name with his well deserved success in mainstream sporting awards, there are a healthy number of other youngsters who, in any other Dexter-less eras would be stars in their own right. In this category is Northern Junior Simon Lawson, who in only his second season of driving has to date driven thirty winners, and currently lies fourteenth in the overall Drivers Premiership ladder. All wonderful stuff and shows that the driving ranks are in good hands going into the future. However, what many of you will not be aware of, is that last Tuesday during the lowly Kumeu meeting at Alexandra Park, this promising lad came within a hairs breadth of becoming the 'late' Simon Lawson when he was involved in a smash which resulted in a horse basically falling on his head. Fortunately he escaped with mild concussion and a few bruises, and the tough little bugger fronted up for work the next day as if nothing had happened. The point of this story? If it hadn't been for the helmet Simon was wearing, the drivers at tonight's Auckland Cup pipe-opener would likely have been wearing black arm bands in his honour. When you are sitting behind half a tonne of horse at around fifty kilometres an hour, to refuse to wear a helmet is both stupid and irresponsible. Nobody hates wearing a hat or helmet more than the writer, but common sense would suggest that it is bordering on suicidal not to. However there are apparently still some ''old-school'' types who persist in not bothering with such safety measures, presumably because they've got away with not wearing one up until now with no damamge, or some other such drivel. The problem is that, not only are they endangering themselves, but they can also be threatening the livelihoods of others. I've had reports of horses being worked on local Christchurch beaches by ''lid-less'' idiots (non-professionals)who have so far managed to avoid serious injury. Trouble is that, when the inevitable happens and someone does get their head smashed open, our friends at OSH will quickly become involved and would likely ban horses from being worked on the beaches at all. How many people would that affect, just because of one act of stupidity? No, we don't all agree with ''nanny'' OSH and some of their ridiculous edicts, but wearing a helmet is most certainly not in that category, OSH or no OSH.

Peter T Cook

For a while now the Association has been concerned at the regularity with which trainers are fined for non-notification of gear changes. In an effort to try and eliminate these penalties we requested that the current gear worn by a horse be printed next to the horses name in the race-book.

Unfortunately, for some reason there has been resistance from Clubs to include this information. However we are pleased to announce that some form of compromise has been reached with the Stipendiary, at least at Addington Raceway.

They have kindly agreed to post a complete list of the gear for all horses racing that night near to the numbers room in the new stable block.

This move is appreciated by the Association and can hopefully be repeated throughout the Country.

Peter T Cook

It's always a tricky question to answer when someone outside the Industry (or even some inside) asks you what happens to horses after they are finished racing. I tend to mumble something about some being used for riding hacks and then my voice trails away as the alternative fate becomes apparent to the person asking the question. Unfortunately the accurate answer is that the majority are euthanased and sold for pet food, as there is just not enough feed or healthy paddocks to house these animals. This has been illustrated more than once when some horse lover with the best intentions ends up with paddocks full of starving ex-racehorses. However an e-mail that came my way this week has indicated that there may be an alternative for at least some of our retired stock. It came from a young lady named Karen who has taken it upon herself to break to saddle and rehouse standardbreds so that they can compete in events including, apparently, A & P Shows. She assures me that the breed is becoming more and more popular among horse riders as they are ideal for trekking and general riding. Karen gave up her job 9 years ago to concentrate on this task, and this, combined with milking cows keeps her very busy. She has access to a dentist, farrier and chiropractor, so it is obvious that these horses are well treated and will make ideal riding horses for almost any task. Karen maintains that she has a waiting list for horses at present, and being based in the Waikato area would love to hear from any trainer who has a horse that they feel would be suitable. She reckons she will take on just about anything...she obviously enjoys a challenge! So anyone out there who has a slow racehorse they are at a loss to know what to do with, give Karen a call on 07-8238281 or 027-2483021 and she will come and pick up in the local areas. If you want to know more about what she does go to www.freewebs.com/track2hacksrus This lady is very dedicated and deserves support.

Peter T Cook

Michael Stiassny

I don't profess to be much of a mathematician, and probably fortunately for the Country, I have not been involved in multi-million dollar businesses, but there are aspects of this One Racing proposal I really struggle with.

On the one hand, we have Racing Board Michael Stiassny claiming that unless the One Racing concept is introduced, the Industry is basically doomed. Then about a month later, he announces a sizeable increase in profit for the first six months of the season, despite the recession, apparently due to the actions of the new highly paid Chief Executive/Hatchet Man Andrew Brown. So maybe the guy is worth the money they are paying him, although it might be a touch early to judge just yet.

What I don't get is, if things are improving at such a rapid rate and the Country is coming out of recession, why on earth would we want to change anything...something about not fixing it if it ''ain't broke'' comes to mind.

Of course the cynical in me suspects that the reason that the guys who came up with the report (heavily Thoroughbred biased) have more knowledge of the workings of that Code than I do and consequently see One Racing as a way to sort out the problems of NZTR without causing a major upheaval in it's ranks. There are also substantial possible benefits for the Thoroughbred code should the proposed amalgamation take place, particularly in the realm of dates and the probable scrapping of the infamous Section 16.

Before I wrote this piece, I did take the time to wade through the waffle that fills up most of the Race Cafe to get a Thoroughbred slant on the matter, and without copying any of them here, there are some very illuminating, not to mention disturbing, opinions to be found in the New Zealand TB section.

Members might also pay to note that neither trainers, jockeys or owners are considered important enough to warrant a vote at the NZTR Executive table......might indicate where their priorities lie.

Peter T Cook

Clerk of the Course

It is with increasing concern that the Association is noting the quality and lack of ability of some Clerks of the Course to perform the duties that they are employed for.

There have been a number occasions recently where these officials have been noticeably inactive when urgent action is required, and while there may be mitigating circumstances that have meant that inaction was the best policy, that is not always the case. The first race at the recent Geraldine Trotting Clubs meeting at Orari is a perfect case in point.

Two drivers were tipped out at the start and one of the horses careered off after field, looped it, and carried on in front until after the event had finished. It was fairly obvious that the horse with a driver in front of the field was severely hampered and probably denied a win, but the most concerning aspect is what could have potentially happened if the driver-less horse had become tangled in it's gear or taken fright, and come down. In these days of Clubs being forced to spend large sums of money ensuring that there racecourses are safe, it seems a little incongruous that one of the major players in maintaining the safety of both drivers and the public, remained a spectator throughout the whole affair.

However, of even greater concern is that several good judges of horse-flesh were adamant that, even if the Clerk of the Course at Orari had been inclined to make an effort to catch the runaway horse, there is no way his portly mount would have been capable of such exertions!

The Association has approached HRNZ on this matter previously, only to be told that any training or qualification for the position of Clerk was not possible, however we have learnt that there is a form of accreditation procedure in Australia, details of which we are attempting to obtain.

While the Clerks employed by the major tracks such as Addington do a super job, there is no way that incompetent officials should be allowed to be simply a bystander when lives are at stake.

Peter T Cook

Ever since I have been involved in the administration of Harness Racing (quite a bit longer than I would care to dwell on), it has been an accepted part of the Industry's tapestry that those involved in the Thoroughbred code looked down there proverbial noses at Harness Racing as the poor relation with phrases such as ''wobblers'' and ''thieves on wheels'' apparently appealing to their collective senses of humour.

There have been numerous instances of those running the Thoroughbred code attempting to laud it over Harness, sometimes successful and sometimes, due to skilful resistance of our administrators, not.

However, this week has seen the Racing Industry's worst kept secret blossom into the open for all to see. A ''taskforce'' consisting of representatives of the thoroughbred code and the Racing Board have unilaterally decided what is good for the whole Industry and seemingly have no time for any detractors in the other codes who may deem that they do not want to be welcomed?? into the fold.

I wonder, could this report be a reaction to turnover on galloping events dropping at an alarming rate, while harness and greyhound hold their own? Could it reflect concern that if present trends continue harness and greyhound turnovers combined will soon be at the same level as galloping. The cynic in me might consider that this undemocratically prepared report is a sign of panic in those who have, traditionally, been the ''older brother'' by right alone. Let us not forget that while harness pays 98% of it's income back to it's participants in stake-money, the galloping powers that be pay only 89%.

Obviously those involved in this report consider that the present framework is not working, however sound business practices by Harness Racing administrators and, apparently, those in the Greyhound code, suggest that it is working as well as possible in the current climate.

Fortunately we have a tenacious leader in Pat O'Brien who, showing his Irish ancestry, has no intention of rolling over and allowing the bully boys to impose their will on others. He will receive the full support of the Trainers & Drivers Association in scuttling this scandalous report.

Peter T Cook

Kristy McDonald

During Cup Week John Lischner and I met with former HRNZ Executive member and now JCA Board member Peter Smith, for preliminary discussions on the production of a DVD to assist license-holders in the enquiry room.

This initiative, originally instigated by JCA Chair Kristy McDonald at a Trainers & Drivers National Council meeting, is designed to instruct drivers (and jockeys), particularly younger ones, on the correct way to present both themselves and their evidence during a JCA hearing. This will have a number of benefits for all parties involved, teaching an understanding of the procedures and the respect that should be afforded JCA panel members, and also advise drivers what they can and cannot do to defend their charge. Obviously, in many cases having just taken part in a race, some drivers, particularly inexperienced ones, are often ill-prepared to front up to Stipendiary Stewards and the JCA and offer rational and unemotional evidence. While that may always be the case given the personalities of some license-holders, the planned DVD will at least offer those people some confidence on how to conduct themselves.

There were a number of issues to be resolved before production can begin, including the format, cartoon or people (a live version was preferred), who would produce the DVD (Trackside would be approached), and would actors or real drivers be used. It was felt that the use of real high-profile drivers would be preferable as other horsemen and women would be able to relate more easily and take more notice if they recognised the participants. The other matter to be determined was the difference in enquiries involving galloping and harness racing – hopefully this could be catered for by producing break-outs from the basic format for each code.

A Committee has been formed to oversee the production of the video and this would consult with two senior horsemen to determine the format and content of this worthwhile initiative.

Peter T Cook

The Offending Shadows The Offending Shadows

To the surprise of no-one the issue of shadows cast by the light poles at Addington Raceway reared it's ugly, and potentially catastrophic, head again at the recent Tuesday meeting.

Race One saw the hot favourite Four Starzzz Art give a spectacular display of leaping (scored 9.1 by the Russian judge) when, despite wearing a shadow roll, he imagined that the shadow on the track at about the 400 metres was a must to avoid. As we all know, a horse jumping into the air wearing hopples doesn't work too well and when it occurs in front of a field of other horses, the risks are increased considerably. Only the fact that the horses behind were still on the bit and some skilled horsemanship by driver, Greater Canterbury Branch Vice-Chairman Mark Jones, prevented a serious accident.

As previously indicated, this is not a new problem. The Association's local Branch has been lobbying Addington Raceway for as long as I can remember (and I've been around for a while – who said too long?) about the shadows cast by the huge power poles and, while there have been meetings with club officials, engineers, stipendiary stewards and anyone else who would listen, nothing has happened.

When new CEO Shane Gloury arrived the subject was raised at one of the regular occasions that he attended a Canterbury Branch meeting, but while he understood the problem and was sympathetic, the cost of any solution appeared, particularly given the fragile state of the NZ Metropolitan Club's finances, to be out of the question. While that is an understandable reality, the Association is still awaiting with baited breath, a horse to react in a similar way to Four Starzzz Art on Cup Day, initiating a chain of events that could potentially turn the Day into a disaster. It has already gone close to happening, just ask Jim Curtin, the driver of Bee Bee Cee in the 1994 New Zealand Cup, or at a night meeting early last season, Mark Purdon, driver of hot favourite Asset Rich.

Obviously the ideal fix would be to replace the old lights and, while that is one the long term agenda, it isn't going to happen overnight. The Greater Canterbury Branch has suggested a short term solution of affixing some form of large cloth or banner to the offending light poles, to at least make the shadows larger and reduce the reaction of horses to the thin lines that are produced currently. The idea has been considered but as yet not moved towards reality.

However there is some positive news. While Tuesdays incident was unfortunate, it may just have been the catalyst to some action. Addington CEO Shane Gloury has had discussions with an engineer and the course electrician regarding possible solutions. I understand that the present towers can be collapsed with the help of a crane, however as this hasn't happened for 46 years, not surprisingly there is some doubt that the mechanism is still operable!

Watch this space for further developments.

Peter T Cook

Part of the reason behind the setting up of this website is to let members, (ie. Licence-holders) know what the Trainers & Drivers Association does behind the scenes.

There is always a constant flow of telephone calls between National Council members and naturally, at the hub of all this discussion, is Chairman John Lischner. John has long been active in various national organisations, particularly in his former life as a butcher, but he is adamant that nothing has compared to the amount of work and issues he deals with on a daily basis in his present position.

Undoubtedly the most important part of this work is representing the Association on the HRNZ Executive when they meet on a regular basis, and when he receives an agenda that is regularly many centimetres thick, you can see what is involved. And that doesn't include various sub-committees such as Rules and Handicapping thrown in for good measure.

Obviously, some of what is discussed at the HRNZ Board table is in Committee and not for publication here and that is how it should be, but we plan publish a rough outline of matters that have been covered which affect horsemen on this site, so that members can understand what we are about, and that we are aware of current issues. Please understand however, that while your Association can put it's case to the governing body (and often does with some vigour), the democratic process means that we won't be granted all our wishes.

So, just to set the ball rolling the following is a sample of the relevant issues discussed at a recent HRNZ Executive meeting.

1)Drivers licences are now compulsory for driving at workouts unless consent is given by the local Committee. 2)Possible changes to rules governing horses away from home base for long periods 3)A review of drug testing procedures for horsemen and women. 4)Driver and gear notification times set at 1pm two days before meeting date. 5)Rules covering the positioning of unruly horses, various starting procedures, and horses going inside the pylons in the last 600 metres. (More on these issues at a later date) 6)No nomination accepted unless the horse is in a trainers name.

There is currently discussion on the future of Friday night racing, turnovers on which are being badly affected by the duel dates structure - a possible solution being a return to Saturday night meetings – watch this space.

Add to these talking points, funding levels, the proposal to amalgamate some aspects of racing with the Thoroughbred code and a reduction in subsidies for Tuesday racing, and you can see our representative has plenty to think about prior to, and during, his meeting with the harness racing hierarchy.

One thing we should all be very conscious of is the moves to eliminate the funding stream from gaming machines into Racing. Any of you who have the ear of a politician should read the details in this weeks Harness Weekly and make them aware of the effect that such a move could have on the Industry.

Anyone with thoughts on any of the above, drop us a note and let us know your feelings

Peter T Cook

The Patriot The Opposition Another Interview Winning Salute To the Victor, the Flowers? Check out the Hooves

Hi everyone, it's great to be home from the World Drivers Championships in Norway. It was an amazing experience to represent our Country and Harness racing in general in such a prestigious event. I relate it the equivalent of going to the Olympics for an athlete, and that is what it felt like every day we competed. Every race day we were driven around the track in flash cars or horse drawn carriages waving our flags. We would then be individually introduced to the crowd and given flowers, along with a memento from the track or the area we were in. After each race a song from the Country of the winning driver (mine was a Split Enz song) would be played. Someone would take the horse and we would be interviewed, given trophies and, yes, more flowers. Everyone would then have their photo taken with the horse, before the driver jumped back in the cart and paraded up the straight. The crowds, although not of Cup Day proportions, all clapped and cheered no matter who had won.

At the end of each days racing the leading points scorer was deemed ''Driver of the Day'' and again introduced to the crowd, given trophies and, you guessed it, presented with flowers, followed by the playing of the drivers National Anthem. I was lucky enough to be ''Driver of the Day'' after the second round at Biri, which was a very proud moment for the New Zealand contingent.

As far as the racing goes, there is 12 minutes between each race, and all horses are warmed up a couple of races before. Three minutes before race start time, everyone is off the track and the field parades up the straight then back past the winning post to the back straight, where some will pull up to allow staff to rush out and put up head checks, attach poles and generally make sure everything is sweet. From then on drivers keep an eye on the mobile which has a clock counting down the three minutes. When it says ''0'' you had better be there because they are going!

After the race the winner goes for the presentation and the rest get off the track and carry on with their warm-ups etc.. All tracks have grandstands in the front straight and stables along the back straight, so you simply drive off the track as you pull up. In between races it looks like organised chaos, but everyone seems to know what they are doing and there is no stress. One thing I thought was great but I know would have some of our local horsemen going nuts, was that warming up on the track at the same time are Coldbloods, Warmbloods (standardbreds), saddle trotters and ponies. Add to that the conditioner and water truck and you get the picture!

All races are over one mile or 2100 metres and the majority are mobile starts. They do have a type of walk-up start where the horses circle behind each other in different directions at half pace, then all of a sudden they are all in a line and away. If a horse is in front of their mark at the ''Go'' signal, they sound a buzzer and all pull up. These seemed to be mainly for the Coldbloods. We saw one race take 4 attempts to get away but they don't worry about making up time – the next race is run 12 minutes after the last one. Wouldn't suit Trackside!

We drove in 20 races at five different venues all over Norway, namely Bergen, Biri, Jarlsberg, Kristiansand and Bjerke. Two of the events were behind Coldbloods which are a Scandinavian breed of horse, a sort of pony. Most are around fifteen hands high with woolly legs like Clydesdales, and the nice ones are beautiful looking animals with long manes and forelocks. They can only run around the equivalent of a 2.07 – 2.08 mile rate at their fastest, and if they gallop, they don't seem to go any faster. It was quite unusual watching them race.

There are some interesting local Rules, some of which are detailed at the end of this piece. One of topical relevance is that not only are there no whips permitted, but you can do very little with the reins as I found out when I was fined NKr1500 (about NZ$360) in my first drive for ''too much'' rein movement. In New Zealand I would have done for not trying! There is no push out or passing lanes but you didn't really need to worry about that as we were restricted to 10 horse fields. After the first round two horses had galloped and were out of it, then when the pressure went on a number of them began to stop so the field spreads out. The horses show no ''battle'', when they feel as though they have had enough, they just pull up, and with no whip to show or flick them with, that's you, all done! I'm sure New Zealanders would love no whips.....yeah right!

If you gallop more than twice or more than 150 metres, you are disqualified and they announce over the speakers that are spread around the track ''number 8 disqualified'', and you have to pull out of the race and get off the track at the first available chance.

Leading for much of the competition was great but it was pretty gutting stumbling at the last hurdle, however there was nothing I could do about it, the horses were just not up to it. I thought I did really well considering I had two winners paying $26 and $28, and the winning driver had four winners paying $1.80, $2, $5 and $5.

I could go on forever, but just to finish, Norway is a beautiful Country and the people were great. We were looked after extremely well and I could not speak highly enough of our hosts. I had great support from my wife Wendy, along with Steve and Ann Phillips who travelled with us. The texts and messages of support from home were great and it was a buzz knowing everyone was behind me.

It is a small piece of my life I will always remember.

Peter Ferguson

Here are a few of the more interesting Norwegian Rules:

Grounds for Disqualification:

The race must be completed at a sound gait. A horse will be disqualified if it;

1. Gains ground or improves it's position while being off stride 2. Goes off stride more than two times (Don't forget they are all trotters) 3. Fails to regain a trotting gait after being off stride within 100m, or 150m within the first 500m of the race 4. Is off stride while crossing the finish line 5. Inappropriate driving has or is thought to have affected the outcome of the race 6. Is driven outside the track boundaries and thereby improves it's position.

Best Possible Placing:

The driver must always attempt to achieve the best possible placing in a race. It is not allowed to pull up or in any other way try to prevent the horse for winning or being placed.

Driving Rules:

The leading horse must stay in the rail (first lane) It is not allowed to:

1. Drive outside the track boundaries 2. Change lanes after entering the final stretch unless overtaking other competitors (not sure how that works??) 3. Change lanes abruptly thereby disturbing, interfering or holding up other competitors 4. Reduce the speed abruptly thereby causing disturbance or interference 5. Cause disturbance or interference in any way or matter.

Conduct of Driving While off -stride:

While off-stride the horse shall cautiously be pulled wide and away from the other competitors. It is not allowed to pull in towards the rail while off-stride unless trying to avoid a dangerous situation. If the horse while off-stride is being pulled outside the track boundaries, it is regarded to be a non-competitor and is not allowed to re-enter the race. If the horse is disqualified it should be cautiously pulled wide and leave the track as soon as possible.

Ethical Regulations:

Excessive urging, abruptly correcting a horse off-stride, vigorous jerking of the lines (reins), inappropriate conduct in general or loud use of voice is not allowed. During the race the driver must keep one line in each hand and both feet in the stirrups. Use of a whip is not allowed in any circumstances.

Safety Regulations:

1. A helmet must be worn at all times while driving a horse both on and off the track. The same applies to anyone handling the horse on the track. 2. All driving at or near race speed must be performed along the inner third of the racetrack in the racing direction. 3. All driving at slow speed must be preformed along the outer edge of the track in the opposite direction. 4. All turns to change direction must be made clockwise after taking proper safety precautions.

Probably one of the most talked about aspects of harness racing these days are barrier draws and how they will, or have, affected the outcome of a race.

Personally I think that far too much is made of them, particularly by some Trackside presenters, who with boring regularity, use a horses draw to predict how a race is to be run, only to end up with what hens lay all over their face. Sure enough, as we all know, a horse drawing wide in a sprint race is at a disadvantage, however if there is enough speed in the early part of the event, you can often see such horses powering over the top and full of energy when the money is paid out. Personally I am a fully subscribed and paid up member of the ''It's only a bad draw after the race” club, preferring to back a better horse with a bad draw than what I consider to be an inferior one with a good marble. Often helps the price too. However enough of my closely guarded ''Secrets of Good Punting'' theories!

At the recent Trainers & Drivers National Council get-together it was plain that all present (and they're a pretty high-profile bunch) had had enough of the present scenario where, due to scratching of ballots etc, there were more horses on the second row of a mobile than the front. Part of the education of a horse is teaching it to get as close to the mobile gate as possible at the starting point. When the poor animal finds itself stuck out on a limb on the outside of the second row with no horses in front of it, what does it do....it tries to catch the gate. But oh no, this time the dumb driver tries as hard as possible to restrain it and keep it one horse and cart length back, so that he doesn't get pinged by the Stipendiary for starting in the wrong position! This is not only an ugly look but, I am reliably informed, potentially dangerous.

Yes I know this is a hoary old chestnut that's been hawked around at meetings for the past few years with all the reasons in the world dragged up why there is no solution to the problem. Maybe that is the problem, the main focus of the numerous discussions on fixing the situation have concentrated fairly and squarely on why things can't be improved, instead of concentrating on why they can. Let me run out a few of the reasons that I've heard and put them to bed.

1.This is only a Southland problem. Wrong. Take a look at the start of this race from Motukarara in December 2008 (arguably the biggest country harness meeting on the calendar).

http://racevideo.hrnz.co.nz/Videos/2008/12/29/20081229-03510-0256.wmv

This is not an isolated example by any means.

2.Clubs shouldn't include any more than two emergencies. So I gather when faced with over 300 nominations, the Club should exclude your horse, only to experience three subsequent scratchings, and your horse is languishing in it's box with grumpy owners?

3.Punters won't know where there horse is drawn. For years now the Greyhound code have successfully employed a system where the emergencies go into boxes vacated by scratchings. A couple of years ago the TAB introduced the software necessary to indicate where a horse was drawn next to it's name on Trackside and TAB sheets, and this can advised to all interested parties as easily as advice of a scratching.

4.It is important for horses to retain the barrier draws they have when the fields are published. Rubbish. If a horse draws 9 at the gate initially and there are scratchings inside it, then it doesn't start from 9 under the current regime. In fact, just the other night at Forbury Park a horse originally given the nine barrier started from 5 after scratchings. In fact if emergencies are given the draws of scratchings, there will most likely be less movement of the majority of horses overall.

So, know it all, I hear you ask, what is the solution? Well of course, everything these days has to have a label or catch phrase, like boy-racers, road rage, taggers, etc, so I've come up with “Scratching Substitute System” which will no doubt be shortened to ''Scratching Sub” or even SSS if you're really short of time.

Emergencies will be given the last three or four numbers on the card and when there is a scratching they will be allocated, in order of their position in the ballot list, the barrier draw of that scratched horse.

I know it sounds scary but most new ideas do, such as push-out rules, safety vests and passing lanes. Life would be strange without them now. Let the Association have your views on this matter and let's get some positive debate going and fix the matter once and for all.

Peter T Cook

STOP PRESS: If you still need convincing of the shambolic current set-up take a look at the start of Race 7 at Forbury Park on 28 May.